By
Charles C. W. Cooke
Monday,
November 07, 2022
Even now, the day before the midterms, the New York Times cannot help but cast Joe Biden as an unfortunate bystander to his own presidency. Here’s Peter Baker, in a piece titled, “As Midterms Near, Biden Faces a Nation as Polarized as Ever”:
President Biden had hoped to preside over a moment of reconciliation
after the turmoil of the Trump years. But the fever of polarizing politics has
not broken ahead of Tuesday’s midterm elections.
Oh, “the
fever of polarizing politics” didn’t break, you say? Could that have anything
to do with Joe Biden, who has now been president for two years? Apparently not:
And so these are frustrating, even perplexing times for Mr. Biden, who
according to confidants had expected the fever of polarizing politics to have
broken by now and was surprised that it had not. The presidency he envisioned,
one where he presided over a moment of reconciliation, is not the presidency he
has gotten. He thought that if he could simply govern well, everything would
work out, which in hindsight strikes some around him as shockingly naïve if
somewhat endearing.
He had
“expected the fever of polarizing politics to have broken by now.” “The
presidency he envisioned, one where he presided over a moment of
reconciliation, is not the presidency he has gotten.” “He thought that if he
could simply govern well, everything would work out.”
The
assumptions here are astonishing and infuriating. The first assumption is that
Joe Biden has had nothing to do with our “polarizing politics.” This is false.
The second assumption is that Joe Biden could preside “over a moment of
reconciliation” while advancing a destructive partisan agenda, while ignoring
the issues voters care about, and while accusing the other party of being
“semi-fascist.” That is impossible. The third assumption is that Joe Biden has
“governed well.” He has not.
Given
how fervently Americans disagree with one another at present, it was always
unlikely that the mere election of Joe Biden would lead to a period of national
unity. But Biden’s behavior — yes, his behavior, not other
people’s — has rendered the idea risible. We are talking here about a president
who has repeatedly downplayed, rejected, and ignored the biggest issues facing
the United States — inflation, crime, and energy — while mawkishly claiming to
have a unique insight into voters’ concerns. We are talking here about a
president whose first major act was to sign a partisan bill that pushed
inflation to record levels, and whose most recent major act was to sign a
partisan bill that cynically
pretended to
address the considerable damage caused by the first. We are talking here about
a president whose mismanagement of the withdrawal from Afghanistan will be
taught for decades to come as the perfect example of what not to
do in foreign affairs. We are talking here about a president who has cast
modest and popular reforms to state election-law as “Jim Crow,” “Jim Crow 2.0,”
and “Jim Eagle”; who has talked about
pro-lifers as
if they were the enemies of democracy; and who simply cannot stop
lying each and
every time he opens his mouth.
As for
this?:
“In the old days, when I was a United States senator, we’d argue like
hell with one another, disagree fundamentally, and go down to the Senate dining
room and have lunch together,” Mr. Biden reflected to an audience in San Diego
last week. “Because we disagreed on the issues, but we agreed on the notion
that the institutions matter.”
Is Biden
out of his mind? These are the reflections of a guy who just tried to illegally
spend a trillion dollars without Congress. They’re the reflections of a guy
who was told by the Supreme Court that he was not allowed to issue another
eviction moratorium without Congress, and who then did it anyway to buy some
time. They’re the
reflections of a guy who spent five decades defending the Senate filibuster,
and then abandoned it the moment it got in the way
of his agenda. They’re the reflections of a guy who could not bring himself to
say, while running
for president, that
court-packing was a bad idea, and who has developed the alarming habit of
engaging in knowingly illegal behavior and then blaming the courts and the
public for having noticed. “We agreed on the notion that the institutions
matter,” Biden says. Who is the “we,” exactly?
Biden’s
world seems to be one in which he and his party are paragons of virtue,
moderation, and calm, and in which everyone who disagrees with them — including
the voters — are extreme bomb-throwers set on thwarting America’s inevitable
return to harmony. Everything Biden does is terrific; it’s the nation that
is in turmoil. Well, unfortunately for Biden, the nation gets a say, too.
No comments:
Post a Comment