By Alexandra DeSanctis
Monday, January 31, 2022
Last week, musician Neil Young issued
an ultimatum: Spotify could either remove Joe Rogan’s immensely popular podcast
or it could remove Young’s catalogue of music. “They can have Rogan or Young.
Not both,” Young
explained.
The musician’s complaint came in response
to what he deemed Covid-19 “misinformation” on The Joe Rogan Experience podcast,
including the host’s skeptical comments about the vaccines. After giving it some thought, Spotify took
down Young’s music, explaining that the supposedly objectionable content on
Rogan’s podcast did not meet the threshold for removal.
Young’s lonely lament might not have
succeeded in silencing Rogan, but he did manage to win himself more attention
than he’s had in decades. (I can say in all sincerity that I can’t remember
having heard of him until this incident.) A staff writer at the Atlantic proclaimed, “In choosing Joe Rogan over Neil Young, [Spotify] has made its new
priorities clear to listeners.” Spoiler alert: The new priorities are Very Bad. A CNN op-ed, meanwhile, hailed the singer for taking “a stand against Covid-19 vaccine
misinformation,” saying he had “put his finger on America’s big divide.” Young
also got a bit of support from fellow C-list celebrities Joni Mitchell and
Brené Brown, who joined him in Spotify self-exile.
Their virtue-signaling departures from the
streaming platform were more than a little amusing. Only a truly enormous ego
could conceive of the idea to withhold one’s work and effectively silence
oneself until the nation’s most popular podcast host is de-platformed. But,
more concerning, the incident has demonstrated the Left’s insidious view of
speech.
To be sure, Joe Rogan has no absolute
right to share his thoughts in a podcast on Spotify or anywhere else — though
it would be silly and spineless for the platform to silence him over
“misinformation.” The worst thing about left-wing demands for his removal isn’t
what it would do to him; it’s what it says about how the people demanding his
cancellation view his listeners.
Calls for silencing someone’s “dangerous”
speech are far less about the speaker than they are about those who hear him.
The impulse to cancel Rogan on the basis that he makes people feel unsafe stems
from the insulting premise that his listeners are too foolish to think for
themselves and must uncritically adopt whatever beliefs the podcast host tells
them to. The people pushing to cancel Rogan are operating from the premise that
most Americans are stupid sheep, dimwitted blank canvases onto which the
intelligentsia — be it Rogan or Anthony Fauci — can project their own opinions.
And the purveyors of cancel culture want their opinions to be
the ones proclaimed as absolute truth.
The impulse to shut down Rogan isn’t
ultimately about making him go away; it’s about controlling what his listeners
believe and what they do as a result. It seems not to occur to Neil Young and
his admirers that half of Rogan’s listeners might well be tuning in because
they want to mock him, or because he’s entertaining, or because they want to
understand how their opponents think. The assumption appears to be that every
Rogan listener will necessarily adopt his every opinion and adapt their
behavior accordingly, even if it means marching to their untimely death.
Thanks to this insultingly low opinion of
the average American, leftists want to silence Rogan not because his views are
unquestionably wrong or objectively dangerous but because they want
their ideas to reign supreme, and the easiest way to do that is to silence
competing claims. If the stupid masses have access to the heterodox ideas
available on Rogan’s podcast, public-health officials and Covid-crazy pundits
will have less power over his listeners’ beliefs and less influence over their
behavior. That’s what progressives can’t stand about free speech: They want to
control what Rogan can say because they want to control what we think.
No comments:
Post a Comment