By Charlie Peters
Tuesday, May 05, 2020
London — William F. Buckley famously said that he
“would rather be governed by the first two thousand names in the Boston
telephone directory than in a society governed by the two thousand faculty
members of Harvard University.”
Myself and other populist-curious conservatives rightly
appeal to this thinking, recognizing the grave idiocy often found in minds
commonly described as “expert.”
But it now appears that the decline of our politicians
and intellectuals has been so colossal that I think I would sooner be governed
by a lottery of random schoolchildren than the legions of great thinkers that
coalesce in government, media, and the law.
The reason for my newfound faith in the political
instincts of the youth comes from the courts, where a 14-year-old schoolgirl
has successfully
defeated Britain’s Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) after it introduced
hate-crime guidance to schools in January and threatened to sue them if they
did not allow transgender children to use their preferred changing rooms or
toilets.
The CPS, hijacked by activists, has gone above and beyond
the already-absurd law in Britain on LGBT issues to introduce measures that
would erode girls’ rights. And now, thanks to a brave schoolgirl, their near-ceaseless
march has been momentarily halted.
Children are brilliantly insightful precisely because
they do not complicate matters. They have a natural grasp over right and wrong,
good and bad. Which is why, unlike their overseers — who have performed the extraordinary
mental gymnastics and endured the political conditioning required to serve in
the British state — they know immediately that biological boys and girls should
not be using the same bathroom.
Many are by now aware of the political power that children
hold, especially on Twitter, where the latest leading light of the liberal left
will gushingly share with us that their six-year-old daughter interrupted a
news bulletin from MSNBC to announce that the “symbiotic relationship between
the market and state power has brainwashed millions into supporting the
remorseless scythe of Capital.” It will receive thousands of retweets. It will
always be a lie.
But this latest case is no lie at all. The instinct for
justice and decency found in this brave, anonymous girl — known only as “Miss
A” — has had a profound effect on British policy and the ever-extending reach
of the state.
This instance reflects a broader and most welcome trend:
a slowdown in the incessant, unwearying march of gender activism.
This anonymous schoolgirl’s defeat of the CPS has come
soon after another example of the trans parade being forced to pause: Last
month, the government announced that it would introduce new curbs on
gender-reassignment surgery to protect children from “irreversible” decisions.
Liz Truss, who juggles the ministerial duties of trade
and women and equalities, said: “Grown adults should be able to make decisions,
to have agency to live life as they see fit. But before the age of 18, when
people are still developing their decision-making capabilities, they should be
protected from making decisions that are irreversible about their bodies that
they could possibly regret in the future.” (The average age at which children
start such treatment is 14, but some start at twelve.)
This intervention is welcome news. Many lives will
benefit from it; instances of deep regret and lifelong suffering will be
prevented.
But many conservatives in Britain were shocked to
discover that — after over a decade of feverishly doing precisely the opposite
— the Tories had decided to implement this socially conservative measure. Since
David Cameron’s surprise coronation in 2005, the party’s focus on winning the
economic war has been met with a total surrender on the social, cultural flank.
The losses have been great. Support from its own members and parliamentarians
has been limited. And, in news that surprises precisely nobody, the left-wingers
Cameron and Co. sought to appease still find them detestable.
The decision of Truss is especially surprising, as the
minister has often been connected with the Whiggish wing of the party. In a
speech to one of the country’s most influential think tanks in 2018, she said:
“In the merits of capitalism, Beyoncé said it best: ‘All the honeys, who making
money, throw your hands up at me.’” Earlier that year, she described Britain’s
young people as “Uber-riding, Airbnb-ing, deliveroo-eating freedom fighters.”
This libertarian language is not typically associated with conservatives
fighting the culture war.
But if even Truss is on our side, then perhaps the as-yet
overwhelming tide of baffling gender policy might finally fail to sweep away
every last conservative concern in its path. A schoolgirl has stood up to the
state, the gender activists, and their boundless cultural support and won.
Conservatives must take heed from this. With the right arsenal, the little guy,
or girl, can defeat even the most powerful foe.
No comments:
Post a Comment