By Kevin D. Williamson
Friday, April 03, 2020
Peter Goodman’s piece in the New York Times
reporting on Denmark’s response to the coronavirus is an example of the Times’s
maddening habit of being pretty good on everything except U.S. affairs. It is
truly irritating.
Goodman reports that Denmark has decided to effectively
nationalize its business payrolls in response to the coronavirus shutdown,
paying most of the wages for furloughed workers as well as providing some
support for business. That’s all true and interesting. And then he adds that
this would be difficult to do in the United States: “In a country that tends to
find cash for tax cuts and military spending while pleading insolvency to
everything else, that makes it politically unimaginable.”
Military spending constitutes 16.2 percent of federal
outlays. The great majority of federal spending in the United States is the
same as it is in the Nordic welfare states: social programs, in our case Social
Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, which together make up more than half of
federal spending.
Goodman argues that what’s needed is — surprise! — higher
taxes. Skinflint Americans: You know the story.
But if Goodman’s numbers are to be believed, the problem
is not that Americans are too cheap but that they are not cheap enough. He
reports a cost of 42.6 billion Danish kroner, or about $1,125 per capita, for
the program in Denmark. Our stimulus bill, on the other hand, will come in at
$2 trillion, or $6,116 per capita. Unless I am missing something, we are
spending five-and-a-half times what the Danes are. Sign me up for that miserly
Nordic model.
No comments:
Post a Comment