By Kevin D. Williamson
Thursday, April 23, 2020
In response to Universities
Decline Coronavirus Relief. Will They Turn Down Subsidies after the Pandemic?
A number of Ivy League schools have turned down
epidemic-relief funds. Daniel Tenreiro writes: “Harvard, Yale, and the rest are
tacitly admitting that they do not deserve pandemic-relief funding.”
I am not sure that this has anything to do with who deserves
what. But those universities are not currently in need of the offered money,
are supported by large endowments, and are sensitive to criticism.
Daniel adds: “But in normal times, they receive massive
annual subsidies. By one estimate, Ivy League schools receive around $7 billion
in taxpayer money every year. Federal dollars directly fund university research
and tuition fees, while tax benefits constitute another massive subsidy to
elite U.S. colleges. If we shouldn’t subsidize universities during recessions,
should we subsidize them when the going is good?”
I suppose that depends on whether you think the country
is better off with or without, say, the Applied Physics Laboratory at Johns
Hopkins University.
The Ivies get the ink, but Johns Hopkins is the federal
government’s largest university research partner. It receives about $2 billion
a year in federal funds and spends $2.3 billion on research and development.
This money goes to everything from the development of spacecraft to medical
research to basic science. Some of the important protective gear that medical
personnel use when dealing with infectious diseases was developed at Johns
Hopkins in response to the Ebola epidemic. We would not have modern genetic
engineering without work done at Johns Hopkins — or pacemakers, polio vaccines,
and much else.
There’s work being done on coronavirus vaccines at Harvard
right now.
It ain’t all underwater basketweaving and foot-stamping
women’s-studies majors.
I am mystified by the Right’s increasingly implacable
hostility to America’s best universities. Yes, I know, the English departments
are full of tenured radicals, in Roger Kimball’s memorable phrase. But our
universities are also home to some of the most important scientific,
technological, and scholarly work being done in the world. Of course, there is
much that needs reforming. There also is much to be grateful for.
(I suppose this is all part of that “nationalism” that
celebrates the nation and its accomplishments, except for the Ivy League, Wall
Street, Silicon Valley, Hollywood, the NFL, art, literature, classical music,
New York City, Chicago, Seattle, Austin, Miami, Boston, Philadelphia, practically
the whole of California . . .)
I do not think the question is who deserves money
from the federal government. The question is what the federal government is
getting for its money. The ROI on university-based scientific and technological
research is pretty good compared to almost anything else the federal government
does. The ROI on granddad’s Social Security check is not very much.
It is true that the major universities are tax-exempt
nonprofits. So are political parties and churches and the National Association
of Realtors and lots of other organizations. That does not seem to me
outrageous. The elite universities and the research done there are exactly the
sort of thing we should be encouraging. Of course waste should be avoided and
meretricious work cut off. But that is a different kind of conversation.
No comments:
Post a Comment