By Ken Langone
Wednesday, April 22, 2020
In our national war against this virus, public trust is
perhaps our greatest weapon. Without it, we can’t hope to succeed in the
extraordinary common effort required to control the virus’s spread, protect our
most vulnerable neighbors, and reopen the economy. The media have a critical
role to play in fostering this trust, and never have we counted on them more to
shoot straight and deliver focused, accurate information from the front lines.
Yet in the midst of the greatest test of their mettle in
a generation, the New York Times devoted a
Sunday front-page article to the absurd claim that criticizing China’s role
in this catastrophe amounts to “scapegoating” that is motivated by bigoted
“xenophobia.” The piece is an example of the axe-grinding ideology pretending
to be news that has become commonplace when our country can least afford it.
It’s a stone-cold fact that the Chinese government
repeatedly misled the world about the origin and nature of the virus. Their
deceit is entirely consistent with how the Chinese Communist Party has mangled
the truth about public-health calamities in the past, including prior
outbreaks, and as far back as the state-induced famines of Chairman Mao, which
killed millions of China’s own citizens.
But according to the Times, Americans are being
manipulated into considering those realities, all part of a cynical strategy to
“divert attention” from domestic politics. For proof, the Times showed
poll results that nearly 80 percent of Americans fault the Chinese government
for dishonesty and negligence in handling the crisis.
How did people get that idea? From “attack ads,” the Times
says, that “rely heavily on images of people of Asian descent.” Yet the only
such depiction they cite was of the former U.S. ambassador to China, who was
shown meeting with their leadership, the
same image the Times itself published when it happened. And how
should an issue ad address China without using any photos of leaders from
China? With mannequins, perhaps?
If the public-opinion numbers about China’s role in the
crisis are right, then by the paper’s own lights, Americans aren’t only
enthusiastic racists; they are too gullible to think for themselves. Isn’t it
more likely that ordinary people in a free society have arrived at those
conclusions on the merits, and elected officials are properly heeding the
public demand that we hold the Chinese government to account?
Americans would also be right to wonder why more
journalists aren’t pursuing a story about China that appears to tick every box
in an investigative reporter’s dream assignment. Here we have an
ultra-secretive police state that won’t even let its own citizens use Facebook.
They put ethnic minorities in concentration camps. The first doctors who
sounded the alarm about the virus were forced to recant at gunpoint. Gee, do
you think maybe all that is worth a closer look?
Yet the very day after American news media were kicked
out of the country, March 18, the Times published an
article based entirely on what Chinese officials told them, with the
headline “China Hits a Coronavirus Milestone: No New Local Infections.” If Times
reporters were not skeptical of that howler, readers sure were. You’d need a
welding mask to read the comments on social media beneath the article.
Plenty of other outlets have followed suit and parroted
China’s bunk. NPR touted China’s claim that “a majority of cases originated
abroad.” Bloomberg declared that “China’s virus cases reach zero.” NBC ran a
piece entitled “As U.S. struggles, China asserts itself as global leader.”
That’s what raises the broader problem that makes this
more than just a quibble about the posturing of Times journalists. When
the public reads news accounts that bestow ridiculous praise on the Chinese government,
or that imply readers are dupes for doubting that regime’s ham-fisted
propaganda, they are highly likely to discount or reject anything else those
publications report about the pandemic.
They won’t believe what those outlets report about the need
for masks or ventilators. They may reject what’s said about the importance of
vaccines or distancing. And when a call to action is given, one that requires
us all to work in unison, many will instead recall the divisive insults they
read in print that took them for fools.
There will be many opportunities and column inches
aplenty for the press to air political grievances between now and Election Day
— and the Times editorial page is welcome to root for whomever it
pleases.
But on this topic and in this time, the press is
squandering the very truth-telling authority it depends on by using its
coverage as a way to score cheap shots.
America needs the fourth estate at its very best right
now. That means unwavering objectivity. It means taking a pause on the usual
sniping and sneering. It’s time to get our head in the ballgame and start
playing like we are all on the same team.
No comments:
Post a Comment