By Kevin D. Williamson
Tuesday, April 28, 2020
Paul Krugman of the New York Times writes that he
has not “heard any Republican complaints about Trump’s huge bailouts for
farmers, whose distress is largely the result of his own policies.”
Perhaps it is the case that Professor Krugman has not
heard such complaints.
Is he listening?
From Politico, “The president’s $12 billion farm
bailout gets an ugly reception among many Republicans in Congress”:
“This is becoming more and more
like a Soviet type of economy here: Commissars deciding who’s going to be
granted waivers, commissars in the administration figuring out how they’re
going to sprinkle around benefits,” said Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.). “I’m very
exasperated. This is serious.”
“Taxpayers are going to be asked to
initial checks to farmers in lieu of having a trade policy that actually opens
and expands more markets. There isn’t anything about this that anybody should
like,” said Sen. John Thune of South Dakota, the No. 3 GOP leader. He suggested
the new spending might need to be offset by cuts in other funding areas.
. . . Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.) said
Trump is giving farmers “golden crutches,” while Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) said
“this bailout compounds bad policy with more bad policy.” Toomey and GOP Sens.
Jeff Flake of Arizona and Bob Corker of Tennessee said their legislation to tie
the president’s hands on tariffs should pick up new steam now that the Trump
administration is distorting the market.
. . . Senate Agriculture Committee
Chairman Pat Roberts (R-Kan.) was unenthused with the bailout because he
worries such payments could become permanent, but he said farmers who supported
Trump are likely to welcome the aid given the dire straits in the heartland.
I timed myself: Finding those complaints took just under
a minute. But it is hard to find such things if you are not looking for them.
What’s worse is that Professor Krugman goes on to
criticize the reporting done on deficit politics, even though he does not seem
to be very familiar with that reporting.
The New York Times opinion pages continue to
exhibit shockingly low intellectual standards, especially in comparison to the
often excellent (and often irreplaceable) work done in the rest of the
newspaper. An opinion column need not go through something like the peer-review
process that one of Professor Krugman’s academic papers would have seen, but
putting the word “opinion” at the top of the page does not license a
self-respecting writer to ignore questions of fact.
No comments:
Post a Comment