By Katherine Timpf
Friday, April 24, 2020
A Harvard University law professor has called for a
“presumptive ban” on homeschooling — claiming that the freedom to do so under
our current laws is “authoritarian.”
“The issue is, do we think that parents should have 24/7,
essentially authoritarian control over their children from ages zero to 18? I
think that’s dangerous,” Elizabeth Bartholet said in an interview with Harvard
Magazine.
“I think it’s always dangerous to put powerful people in
charge of the powerless, and to give the powerful ones total authority.”
Bartholet stated that there is “an essentially
unregulated regime in the area of homeschooling,” with “very few requirements
that parents do anything.”
“[P]eople can homeschool who’ve never gone to school
themselves, who don’t read or write themselves,” she said.
Bartholet also stated that homeschooling can make it
easier for parents to get away with abusing their children and/or
indoctrinating them with white supremacy and misogyny:
[I]t’s also important that children
grow up exposed to community values, social values, democratic values, ideas
about nondiscrimination and tolerance of other people’s viewpoints.
I do not, of course, want to minimize the absolute horror
of child abuse. It’s disgusting; it’s heartbreaking; and anyone who isn’t
a sociopath agrees that it’s necessary to protect our children.
Unfortunately, however, it’s also true that abuse is
hardly something that can occur only in a child’s home. In fact, as Harvard
grad and homeschooler Kerry McDonald pointed out in
a letter to Harvard Magazine in response to its article, “many
parents choose to homeschool their children to remove them from abuse at
school, whether it’s widespread bullying by peers or, tragically, rampant abuse
by teachers and school administrators themselves.”
“Banning homeschooling, or adding burdensome regulations
on homeschooling families, who in many instances are fleeing a system of
education that they find harmful to their children, are unnecessary attacks on
law-abiding families,” McDonald continues.
What’s more, another of Bartholet’s suggestions — that
the freedom to homeschool equals masses of children being painfully
undereducated by illiterate parents — is as offensive as it is inaccurate. In
fact, many, many children don’t simply receive an adequate education
through homeschooling but an exemplary one that sets them up for greater
success than any traditional school could have. As McDonald pointed out in her
letter, although “there may always be outliers and more research is needed,
most peer-reviewed studies on homeschooling outcomes find that homeschoolers
generally outperform their schooled peers academically, and have positive life
experiences.”
In any case, and even apart from all of this, Bartholet’s
characterization of the freedom to homeschool as “authoritarian” is nothing
short of absurd. A government allowing its citizens the freedom to educate
their own children is not only not authoritarian, it is also the exact
opposite of authoritarian. That’s a fact, and you don’t even need to know
the first thing about homeschooling to understand that — really, you just need
to know what the word means.
In terms of knowing about homeschooling, though, I can
also say that I personally do know more than the average person. I was
homeschooled for fourth and fifth grade, and can confidently say that the two
years I spent with my father as my teacher were responsible for countless
positive outcomes in my life — ones that I wouldn’t have had otherwise. For
example: Before I was homeschooled, I was struggling to learn math the way that
the public school had been teaching it, and getting the chance to learn some
fundamentals in a way that worked for my own particular brain was
instrumental in making the subject much easier for me in the future.
But that wasn’t all. See, unlike math, I loved reading and
writing. Those subjects had always come easily to me, and I enjoyed them.
Homeschooling provided an advantage for me in this area, too. It allowed me to
learn advanced aspects of grammar. I had the liberty to read works of
literature that I wouldn’t have studied in a traditional school because they
would have been “above” the designated level for my classroom. I wrote poetry
and short stories about subjects of my own choosing. When I returned to public
school in the sixth grade, the English lessons were things that I’d already
learned — but fortunately, having had the opportunity to develop a love of
writing and curiosity about books is something that kept me reading and writing
what I wanted in my own time. Hell, I’m still doing it now.
Finally, it’s also patently ignorant how Bartholet aims
to use the fact that children must be exposed to varying viewpoints and people
while they’re growing up as some kind of argument against homeschooling.
McDonald states that “research on homeschoolers finds that they are tightly
connected with their larger community and may have more community involvement
and participation in extracurricular and volunteer activities than schooled
children due to their more flexible schedules and interaction with a wide
assortment of community members,” and I’m not surprised. In fact, this was my
experience exactly.
I mean, does Bartholet think not attending a traditional
school somehow means that I never left the house at all? Because honestly, that
couldn’t have been less true. I was quite active in my community, even
participating in activities such as Girl Scouts with my friends from public
school. I didn’t miss out on any of that.
In fact, I was actually exposed to far more experiences
and perspectives specifically because I was homeschooled. I was able to
act in community theater plays at multiple venues, interacting with all kinds
of interesting people from various walks of life, without having to
worry that a late-night dress rehearsal would make me too exhausted to learn in
the morning because my schedule revolved around me. For the same
reason, my family was able to take a random trip to New York City to see my
father’s friend’s play — and within hours of arrival, I decided I was definitely
going to move here when I grew up and work either on a stage, in front of a
camera, or both. I had the luxury of learning from truly transformative, unique
experiences, ones that I certainly wouldn’t have had if I’d been forced to
spend that time square dancing in a gymnasium.
Harvard Magazine points out that “rapidly
increasing” numbers of Americans are choosing to homeschool their children. (By
“choosing,” by the way, I mean that this was true before coronavirus
essentially forced this lifestyle on everyone.) Bartholet apparently sees this
as some kind of tragedy that will lead to a future generation full of sexist
Nazis who don’t know how to read, but this simply isn’t fair. No, homeschooling
isn’t perfect for everyone, but it can and has worked uniquely well for
many people, myself included. We shouldn’t be taking that option away, and
certainly not in the name of stopping authoritarianism. It isn’t hard to
see how completely a**-backwards that “logic” is — after all, even a former
homeschooler like me was able to figure it out.
No comments:
Post a Comment