By George Will
Thursday, October 17, 2019
Presidential aspirant Beto O’Rourke, thrashing about in
an attempt to be noticed, says tax exemptions should be denied to churches and
other institutions that oppose same-sex marriage. O’Rourke’s suggestion, and
Massachusetts senator Elizabeth Warren’s plan to tax the “excessive” exercise
of a First Amendment right, and the NBA’s painful lesson about the perils of
moral grandstanding illustrate how progressivism has become a compound of
self-satisfied moral preening and a thirst for coercion.
O’Rourke is innocent of originality: Harvard law
professor Mark Tushnet recommends a “hard line” against people who deviate from
progressivism: “Trying to be nice to the losers didn’t work well after the
Civil War” and “taking a hard line seemed to work reasonably well in Germany
and Japan after 1945.” Apparently it is progressive to regard unprogressive
Americans as akin to enemies vanquished in wars. No Churchillian nonsense about
“in victory, magnanimity.”
UCLA law professor Eugene Volokh notes that in 1952
California voters used a progressive device, a referendum, to amend the state’s
constitution to deny tax exemptions to certain people despised by the majority
— people who advocated the unlawful overthrow of the U.S. government.
Fortunately, in 1958, in another case from California (concerning denial of
property tax exemptions to veterans who refused to swear an oath not to
advocate the unlawful overthrow of the government), the U.S. Supreme Court did
its counter-majoritarian duty to protect minority rights, striking down this
measure: “To deny an exemption to claimants who engage in certain forms of
speech is . . . the same as if the state were to fine them for this speech.”
Warren, a policy polymath, has a plan for everything,
including for taxing speech that annoys her. The pesky First Amendment (in
2014, 54 Democratic senators voted to amend it to empower Congress to regulate
spending that disseminates political speech about Congress) says Congress shall
make no law . . . abridging the right of the people “to petition the government
for a redress of grievances.” One name for such petitioning is lobbying. Warren
proposes steep taxes (up to 75 percent) on “excessive” lobbying expenditures,
as though the amendment says Congress can forbid “excessive” petitioning.
Lobbyists are unpopular, and her entire agenda depends on what the amendment
was written to prevent — arousing majority passions against an unpopular
minority (the wealthy). Warren, who like O’Rourke is operatic when denouncing
Donald Trump’s ignorance of, or hostility to, constitutional norms, might not
be a plausible person to make the case against him.
“In defeat, defiance” was Churchill’s recommendation. The
NBA’s is: When tyrants snarl, grovel. Beijing’s tantrum — great powers do not
resemble frustrated toddlers — was detonated by a Houston Rockets employee who
tweeted support for Hong Kong protesters. Commissioner Adam Silver, who
represents the teams’ owners—
Sorry. Forgive the insensitivity. The NBA has been so
insufferable in its virtue signaling, so relentless in its progressive preening,
that this past summer it announced that it has “moved away” from calling those
who own teams “owners.” The term supposedly carries connotations of slavery.
But back to Silver. He took the 2017 All-Star Game away
from Charlotte, so horrified was the NBA by a North Carolina law requiring
transgender people to use public bathrooms according to the sex on their birth
certificates. The NBA’s decision expressed its “long-standing core values,”
which are, however, compatible with the NBA having its China training camp in
Xinjiang province, where Chinese citizens are in concentration camps that
facilitate “re-education.”
There is strong evidence (from an independent tribunal
that met in London) that China, which has many more people in concentration
camps — perhaps 1.5 million in Xinjiang alone — than Hitler had during the 1936
Olympics, is still harvesting organs, including hearts, from prisoners, some
while still alive, for Chinese and foreign purchasers. Silver, however, is
ostentatiously sensitive about “owners,” so Beijing should avoid that word, or
else. The NBA should have done what a congressional letter recommends: suspend
activities in China until “government-controlled broadcasters and
government-controlled commercial sponsors end their boycott of NBA activities
and the selective treatment of the Houston Rockets.” This would have caused
Beijing’s infantilism to become a national embarrassment — a weak nation’s idea
of national strength.
Unfortunately, however, O’Rourke, Warren, and Silver
demonstrate the tendency of too many progressives to cut constitutional
corners, to despise and bully adversaries, and to practice theatrical but
selective indignation about attacks on fundamental American principles, some of
which they themselves traduce. Just what we did not need in our dispiriting
civic life — additional evidence that there really is no such thing as rock
bottom.
No comments:
Post a Comment