By Douglas Murray
Monday, October 21, 2019
There are a lot of extraordinary events happening in the
UK at the moment, some of which I address in my cover piece in the current
issue of National Review. But
amid all the big Brexit events, some of the broader matters of the culture are
inevitably getting lost, which is a shame because they will be with us whether
we ever manage to leave the European Union or not.
In July I wrote here
about one of the increasing number of occasions when the intersectional rainbow
gets inadvertently rent in twain. On that
occasion it was video from a ‘Pride’ parade in East London where local gays
found themselves being abused by a niqab-wearing Muslim woman. Specifically the fully-covered woman in
Waltham Forest attacked the rainbow-flag bedecked marchers with cries such as
“Shame on you, you despicable people.”
Thus did “Pride” culture meet “Shame” culture, and some
of us remain very interested in who, in the long-term, might win such a
stand-off.
In any case, I return to the story because there has been
a development. Back in July a number of
people immediately called for the culprit to be tracked down and prosecuted for
her crimes. Though I was suspicious
whether the long arm of the law would ever catch up with the culprit. For while the police might have found
populating the niqabi line-up to be an absolute doozy, I wouldn’t like to be
the gay who had to figure out which niqabi in the line-up was my abuser. Any incorrect identification would have been
the absolute epitome of ‘Islamophobia’, almost certainly leading to new
charges.
Yet what I failed to take into account was that while the
British police are still terrible at stopping Londoners from knifing each other
to death, they are an absolutely crack force when it comes to tracking down and
prosecuting “hate crimes.” So through
some uncommon detective work, the culprit was found and has in recent weeks
been hauled before the bench.
Thirty-eight year old Jamila Choudhury of East London was charged last
month and convicted in super-quick time at the start of this month. The crime was a homophobic hate-crime which
the judge in the case declared constituted “an attack on the [LGBT+]
community.”
The judge gave Choudhury a three-month suspended sentence
and she was also ordered to take part in a 40-day anger-management activity as
well as paying £100 of compensation to nine people she abused, in installments
of £10 a week. Which seems on the low
side to me. Perhaps next year’s marchers
could sport T-shirts reading, “I got abused at Walthamstow Pride and all I got
was ten quid.”
Interestingly, it emerged at the trial that the Ms.
Choudhury was already under a community order for calling a London Underground
employee a “black piece of trash.” Her
defender in court said in mitigation that Choudhury suffers from health
problems including an auto-immune disease and that when Choudhury saw the
footage of her actions at Pride she was “devastated” and “didn’t recognize who
she saw.” Such was her shame around her
actions and the subsequent publicity that it was said that at the salon where
Ms. Choudhury works, she felt “ashamed” to look some of the customers in the
eye.
At this point there were a number of cracks that it might
be possible to make. But after
Choudhury’s conviction the gay pride organizers immediately, and predictably,
announced that “We condemn outright and unequivocally all forms of hatred and
abuse, including Islamophobia and anti-Semitism” and “utterly condemn any
attempts to use this incident to fan the flames of discord between
communities.” In a country where the police now tell us what pronouns we should
and should not use, it becomes increasingly clear that unless we want to be
embroiled in rolling hate crime cases to the end of our days, the best thing to
say is nothing at all.
No comments:
Post a Comment