By Kevin D. Williamson
Wednesday, August 07, 2019
There are two rules for illiberal democracy.
The first rule is that during an emergency certain
illiberal and anti-democratic measures are necessary to ensure public safety,
national security, and the practice of democracy itself.
The second rule is that there is always an emergency.
With the horrifying massacres in El Paso and Dayton,
political entrepreneurs already are taking recourse to the tenets of illiberal
democracy. But because this is the United States, and the most powerful nation
in the world is governed by criminals, miscreants, and morons, illiberal
democracy is not the scoundrels’ last recourse — it is their first recourse.
Cory Booker, trafficker in absurd
racial conspiracy theories, is a great practitioner of illiberal democracy.
In response to the shootings over the weekend, he demanded that . . .
Republican campaign rallies be canceled as a public-safety measure. President
Donald Trump’s rallies, he insists without anything that might plausibly be
described as evidence, “inspire white nationalist attacks like the one in El
Paso on Saturday.” Somehow, the pursuit of public safety always ends up
disadvantaging the other party’s political efforts. One might be forgiven for
failing to take Senator Booker seriously, for this and for many other reasons.
Elsewhere, progressives have called for forcibly
disbanding the National Rifle Association, freedom of association be damned.
Democrats elsewhere have called for designating the NRA a “terrorist
organization.” Democrats in New York have abused the power they have over the
financial-services industry to try to shut down the rival political
organization through backdoor means.
Others have called for gutting the Bill of Rights and
trampling on due process, empowering government to curtail, suspend, or revoke
the civil rights of Americans who have not been arrested or charged with any
crime, much less convicted of one.
To the German political theorist Karl Loewenstein we owe
the term streitbare Demokratie, or “militant democracy,” the principle
that liberal democratic governments must sometimes employ illiberal and
undemocratic means to fight nascent totalitarian movements. This is the theory
under which Germany bans certain political parties (both neo-Nazi parties and
some Communist parties) while countries such as Austria can hand down lengthy
prison sentences for selling forbidden political books. The United States historically
has not countenanced such invasions, and classical liberalism is embedded in
our Constitution through the Bill of Rights — which is, it is important to
understand, a check on democracy, putting certain principles beyond
referendum. The American model has targeted such organizations as the Ku Klux
Klan and the Weather Underground not as ideological offenders but as
organizations engaged in criminal conspiracies independent of their political
views, however repugnant those views may be. But the American Left (and, to a
lesser extent, certain populist constituents of the Right) has abandoned that
liberalism and looks partly to Western Europe for other models.
The catalogue of illiberal policies the Left stands ready
to enact is substantial and sobering. Democrats would impose licensing on
political criticism in the guise of “campaign finance reform” and would
prohibit the communication of certain unpopular ideas as “hate speech.”
Progressives have argued for jailing people holding dissenting views on climate
change, and Democratic prosecutors have in fact investigated companies and
political advocates on precisely those grounds. Some elements of the Left, such
as Antifa, have openly embraced violence as a means of suppressing unpopular
political speech, but Senator Booker’s more polite model is more common and, if
anything, more insidious.
It is strange that Democrats believe, simultaneously,
that President Trump is the moral equivalent of Adolf Hitler and that the
government over which he presides should be given extraordinary new powers to
police political speech and other civil rights. One might be forgiven for
failing to take the Democrats seriously, for this and for many other reasons.
If I may quote from The Smallest Minority:
Loewenstein argued that fascism was
not an ideology but a technique, which it is—one that is
independent of any particular policy content and that can be made to serve any
political agenda, from Hitler’s psychotic Jew-hatred to Mussolini’s romantic
corporatism to Stalin’s “scientific” socialism to Antifa’s self-professed
antifascism. The classical technique of fascism described by Loewenstein relied
on exploiting nationalism or other appeals to solidarity, together with newly
available forms of media and communication that could be harnessed to achieve
“a supersession of constitutional government by emotional government.” One
wonders what he might have made of 21st-century social media: “The technical
devices for mobilizing emotionalism are ingenious and of amazing variety and
efficacy,” he wrote, “although recently become more and more standardized.
Among them, besides high-pitched nationalist enthusiasm, the most important
expedient, perhaps, is permanent psychic coercion, at times amounting to
intimidation and terrorization scientifically applied.”
Loewenstein was of course correct about fascism being a
technique; what he failed to appreciate was that his “militant democracy,”
allowed to take its natural intellectual and political course, ends up being a
technique, too — the same technique. The authoritarian political
entrepreneur relies on a threat that is exterior, specific, and easily
identified: Hitler and the Jews, the Communists and the capitalists,
contemporary American progressives and the “1 percent,” etc. Where there is a
real threat, it can be exaggerated, and its relationship with political
opponents misconstrued. Where there is no useful threat at hand, one can be
invented, hence the rash of fake hate crimes and politically motivated false
rape accusations on college campuses and in progressive communities, and the
attribution of SPECTRE-like powers of world-bestriding villainy to such
amorphous rhetorical constructs as “patriarchy” and “white supremacy,” the
bounds of which are in these illiterate times copious enough to embrace every
shampoo commercial ever made.
Emergency is the short road to tyranny. And the 2020
Democrats, among others, are careering down that road as fast as they can.
No comments:
Post a Comment