By Kevin D. Williamson
Friday, August 16, 2019
Michael Brendan Dougherty writes: “There’s nothing wrong
with being a barre instructor. There’s nothing wrong with detailing cars. But
we should be wary of the social and political effects of an economy that
encourages the creation of these types of jobs instead of others.” The nation’s
barre instructors and car detailers no doubt would express their gratitude to
Michael for his affirmation, if only they knew how.
Question: Where is the evidence supporting the use of the
word “instead” in that sentence?
It is likely that the alternative to working in a service
job is unemployment or another service job rather than the “others” that
Michael says he prefers. Lots of people say they prefer those jobs, too.
But their revealed preferences say otherwise. If you want to work in a
food-processing plant, Alaska awaits. Delta is ready when you are.
More to the point: “The economy” doesn’t create service
jobs. Disposable income and a desire for more leisure time create service jobs.
My grandparents raised chickens. I get my eggs from somebody else who raises
chickens. Why? Because raising chickens is not a very good use of my time, and the
other guy has really, really good eggs. There are a lot of people who have the
opportunity to raise chickens. But, strangely, most of them prefer the grocery
store.
Michael writes about his envy of his grandparents’
generation. “They were part of America’s post-war middle class,” he writes,
“really, an affluent proletariat.” As I’ve pointed out before, the
“proletariat” of that time was not really very affluent at all, and anybody who
wants a 1959 standard of living can have one — cheap. You can buy
yourself a 20-year-old Volvo for about two grand and have a better car than a
millionaire had in the postwar golden years. You can buy a house typical of my
grandparents’ generation for about $20,000 in a place like Liberal, Kansas, or
Borger, Texas, where some of our affluent proletarian ancestors worked in
carbon-black plants. They still do, in Borger, and other towns like that. In
fact, there are jobs open at carbon-black plants right now. Get thee to
Ponca City, Okla.
My grandparents, like Michael’s, lived in a very
different America. They cut their own hair and made their own clothes, and they
saved money on entertainment by spending their afternoons and evenings picking
cotton and canning their own food. In their view, at the time, people who did
otherwise were symptomatic of a “labor market drifting toward service work for
the rich,” as Michael quotes Oren Cass telling the story. The difference
between a service job in 1963 and a service job today is that our grandparents
did not sneer at barbers for being barbers, or judge that they had failed in
life because they weren’t down on the assembly line bolting bumpers on Buicks.
Why not cut your own hair? Why not make your own clothes?
Why not grow your own food? Why not dig your own well and provide your own
water? If the answers to those questions seems obvious, why is it so difficult
to imagine that we who are radically wealthier than our grandparents also
consume services that were not common in the Eisenhower years or the Kennedy
years?
The guy who details my car drives a Mercedes. He owns his
own business and gives no indication that he feels victimized by his situation.
If only he knew what he was missing! He could be plucking a chicken for his
dinner! He could be a yeoman! The poor prole just doesn’t know any
better.
No comments:
Post a Comment