By David Harsanyi
Wednesday, May 29, 2019
“Speak up, now, when you glimpse evidence of
anti-Semitism, particularly within your own ranks, or risk enabling the spread
of this deadly virus,” advises a New York
Times editorial that fails to mention the words “Ihan Omar,” “Rashida
Tlaib,” “Women’s March,” “Black Congressional Caucus,” or anything about the
Democratic Party’s complicity in enabling these people and groups, for that
matter.
To be fair, as far as New
York Times editorials go, this isn’t the worst. It does, however, engage in
the ugly leftist habit of blaming Jews for engendering hatred against
themselves while downplaying inconvenient facts about anti-Semitism in Europe.
Earlier this year, the Jerusalem Center for Public
Affairs pointed
out that nearly 90 percent of European Jews have suffered some form of
anti-Semitic threat, insult, or assault. Of those polled, 30 percent identified
the perpetrator as “someone with an extremist Muslim view,” 21 percent as
someone with left-wing political views, and 13 percent as someone with
right-wing politics.
Even the Times,
which insinuates that the rise of anti-Semitism in Europe can largely be blamed
on neo-fascists, was compelled to note that a European Union survey from 2018
found that 41 percent of German Jews who had experienced anti-Semitic
harassment over the past five years believed the most serious incidents were
perpetrated by “someone with a Muslim extremist view.”
“Whatever the reasons for the discrepancy,” the Times writes, brushing off its own
advice about enabling hate, “the message from the German government is that
anti-Semitism is not largely an imported
problem, as far-right groups often maintain — as justification also for
their Islamophobia.” The German government’s message to Jews, if we can be
forgiven for a bit of skepticism, isn’t terribly convincing.
For one thing, if some wily “far-right” group is
condemning anti-Semitism by pointing out some indisputable facts about Muslim
immigration, it’s probably a good bet that the group isn’t as radical as the Times might have us believe.
“Islamophobia,” after all, is often used to chill speech critical of a certain
political and religious philosophy that has an important place in the left’s
panorama of victimhood.
For another thing, The
New York Times editorial board probably hasn’t been following the news. A
number of German officials have already accused the police of obscuring
the number of “Muslim extremists and anti-Zionists” who have engaged in
anti-Jewish behavior. As Felix Klein, the commissioner tasked with combating
anti-Semitism, has conceded, “the subjective perception of the threat posed by
Muslim antisemitism is greater than is expressed in the criminal statistics.”
There is plenty of evidence to support this opinion.
Not all refugees from Islamic nations are anti-Semites,
and only fraction are violent. That doesn’t change the fact that Muslims make
up only 5.7 percent of the German population, yet are responsible for somewhere
between 30 to 50 percent of anti-Jewish hate crimes—and a larger percent of
violent incidents. Even if we accept the low-end number, the uptick in
anti-Semitic incidents over the past five years isn’t exactly difficult to
track down.
In Germany, police now must guard every synagogue, Jewish
school, and daycare center. This is not a tenable situation for any community
in any free nation. It was only this weekend that Klein noted he would “no
longer recommend Jews wear a kippa at every time and place.”
The context of Klein’s comment, it should be noted, was
the upcoming, and increasingly popular, al-Quds day in Berlin—an annual
“anti-Zionist” event rife with old-school Jew hatred that was created by the
ayatollah of Iran in 1979, advocating for the destruction of Israel and the liberation
of Jerusalem from the Jews.
The Times does
concede that “radical Islam” is a problem in Europe. But a recent German
intelligence study on general Muslim attitudes towards Jews found that hatred is imported and widespread. Turkey, a
nation with many immigrants now in Germany, is one of the least anti-Semitic countries, and even there Jews were at “nearly
70 percent” unfavorability. An Anti-Defamation League poll found that 93
percent of Palestinians hold, not anti-Israeli views, but anti-Jewish beliefs.
A Pew poll found that in Jordan 99 percent have an
unfavorable view towards Jews, and the same in Lebanon. In Egypt, it’s 98
percent. And so on. Even in Muslim-majority Indonesia, where there has never
been more than a couple of thousand of Jews living at one time, 76 percent have
an unfavorable view.
Perhaps perceptions regarding Jews will change once
Muslim immigrants become acclimated to Western life. Or perhaps “anti-Zionism”
will be normalized in Europe. Whatever the case, it’s absurd to believe that
millions of new immigrants haven’t transported those views. Then again, the Times adds, maybe Jews shouldn’t be
wearing their yarmulkes in public.
“Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,” the editorial agues,
“has not helped matters by finding common cause with nationalist leaders like
the Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban or President Trump so long as they do
not support a Palestinian state.” How has this not helped?
Netanyahu has, of course, found common cause with a
number of leaders who support a two-state solution, including George W. Bush.
So the notion that the Israeli-American alliance is predicated on opposing the
creation of a Palestinian state is absurd. The Palestinian state isn’t a
reality because leadership in those territories embrace terrorism and make
outlandish demands that would end the state of Israel.
One wonders, though, if the New York Times editorial writer sees any incongruity in demanding
Israelis sit down with group of people who are virulently anti-Semitic and
illiberal while wagging their finger at Israelis for being friendly with
Hungary, a nation that protects its Jews and fights for Israel in the European
Parliament.
Orban’s Hungary is far from perfect—although also far
from the fascistic place his antagonists would have you believe. Yet its
100,000 Jews didn’t report a single physical attack against them in the past
two years. It seems Jews are enjoying something of a renaissance in that
country.
As Evelyn Gordon at Commentary noted not long ago,
American Jews might believe that “rightist governments enable anti-Semitism” in
Europe, but polls show that Jews feel safer, sometimes by a 20-point margin, in
places like Poland, Hungary, and Romania—which, maybe not coincidentally, also
have low numbers of Muslim immigrants—than they do in countries like France and
Germany, where anti-Jewish violence is spiking.
According to the Times,
though, Israel’s leaders also perpetuate
anti-Semitism when they find common cause with the president of United States,
who has angered anti-Semites worldwide by taking positions once widely
supported by a majority of American Jews, like moving the American embassy to
the capital of Jerusalem and pulling the United States out of the disastrous
Iranian nuclear deal.
It’s gotten to the point where the left regularly lumps
the elected leader of the Jewish state in with white supremacists because he’s
shown more deference to Donald Trump than to Hamas, Fatah, or Iran. If Israel
engenders anti-Semitism, a sentiment that supposedly has absolutely nothing to
do with Israel, it’s only because people are predisposed to hating Jews.
Then again, maybe the Times doesn’t understand that it’s
not Israel’s or America’s job to placate anti-Semitic thugs in Germany. One of
the reasons Israel exists, actually, is so Jews would never again have to worry
about such things.
No comments:
Post a Comment