By Kevin D. Williamson
Monday, May 13, 2019
National Review
has been hosting a
discussion about free enterprise and socialism, and it contains some very
good stuff. But it is dispiriting that we must have this conversation — again —
at all. Socialism’s record is a matter of history. But, for reasons having
partly to do with lack of memory, “never again” once again has been superseded
by “this time it will be different,” at least on parts of the Left.
The United States is not very much like Venezuela, but it
is like Venezuela in one important thing: In Venezuela, the failures of
socialism were blamed on anything but the policies themselves: capitalism,
imperialism, sabotage, hoarding, etc. In the United States, the failures of
socialism are blamed on anything but socialism. They are blamed on
“inequality,” the wealthy, “globalists,” etc.
The United States is not a socialist country, but we have
instances of socialism. Public K–12 education, for example, in which the state
owns the means of production, manages them through political bureaus (with
democratically elected boards in most cases), the labor force consists of state
employees, etc. Public K–12 education is in much of the country a disaster. It
is a much greater disaster especially in those places in which the Democratic
party and its most socialistic members prevail: In the big cities where no
Republican, much less any conservative, has exercised any real influence in
generations.
What is the Democrats’ prescription for these socialist
failures? More socialism.
Our economic is enormously productive, and the real
standard of living for Americans has increased dramatically over the past
several decades. We take for granted products and services that once were
luxuries and conveniences for millionaires.
But there are important areas of failure. Not
coincidentally, these are clustered in those areas in which the socialist model
most strongly predominates: education, health care, retirement. It is in these
areas that the ideas associated with Senator Warren, Senator Sanders,
Representative Ocasio-Cortez, et al., have had the most influence. The public
schools, in particular, have been a progressive fief for decades and decades.
And while real-dollar per-student spending has climbed substantially, outcomes
have stagnated or worse.
There is room for public welfare and for government
action beyond the provision of narrowly defined public goods. But socialism is
a different and distinct thing from the offering of welfare benefits and the
like. It is not the case that the answer to every question is “Markets will
take care of it!” or “Private charity will take care of it!” (The answer very
often is one of those.)
But the failure of discrete socialism is not a warrant
for more general socialism, except in the minds of ideologues who are disposed
to see everything as a warrant for more general socialism.
No comments:
Post a Comment