By David Harsanyi
Thursday, May 30, 2019
Climate isn’t the same as weather—unless, of course,
weather happens to be politically useful. In that case, weather portends climate
apocalypse.
So warns Elizabeth Warren as she surveyed Iowan
rainstorms, which she claims, like tornadoes and floods, are more frequent and
severe. “Different parts of the country deal with different climate issues,”
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D–Malthusia) cautioned as she too warned of
extreme tornadoes. “But ALL of these threats will be increasing in intensity as
climate crisis grows and we fail to act appropriately.”
Sen. Jeff Merkley (D–Ore.) recently sent a fundraising
email warning Democrats that climate change was causing “growing mega-fires,
extremely destructive hurricanes, and horrific flooding” in which “American
lives are at stake.”
Even if we pretend that passing a bazillion-dollar
authoritarian Green New Deal would do anything to change the climate, there is
no real-world evidence that today’s weather is increasingly threatening to
human lives. By every quantifiable measure, in fact, we’re much safer despite
the cataclysmal framing of every weather-related event.
How many of those taken in by alarmism realize that
deaths from extreme weather have dropped
somewhere around 99.9 percent since the 1920s? Heat and cold can still be
killers, but thanks to increasingly reliable and affordable heating and cooling
systems, and other luxuries of the age, the vast majority of Americans will
never have to fear the climate in any genuine way.
Since 1980, death
caused by all natural disasters and heat and cold is somewhere under 0.5
percent.
It’s true that 2019 has seen a spike in tornadoes, but
mostly because 2018 was the first year recorded without a single violent
tornado in the United States. Tornadoes killed 10 Americans in 2018, the fewest
since we started keeping track of these things in 1875, only four years after
the nefarious combustion engine was invented.
There has also been a long-term decline in the cost of
tornado damage. In 2018, we experienced near-lows in this regard. The only
better years were 2017, 2016, and 2015.
After a few devastating hurricanes around a decade ago,
we were similarly warned that it was a prelude to endless storms and ecological
disaster. This was followed by nine years without a single major hurricane in
the United States. Or, in other words, six fewer hurricanes than we experienced
in 1908 alone.
According to the U.S. Natural Hazard Statistics, in fact,
2018 saw below the 30-year average in deaths not only by tornadoes and
hurricanes (way under average) but also from heat, flooding, and lighting. We
did experience a slight rise in deaths due to cold.
Pointing out these sort of things usually elicits the
same reaction: Why do you knuckle-dragging troglodytes hate science? Well,
because science’s predictive abilities on most things, but especially climate,
have been atrocious. But mostly because science is being used as a cudgel to
push leftist policy prescriptions without considering economic tradeoffs,
societal reality, or morality.
There are two things in this debate that we can predict
with near certitude: First, that modern technology will continue to allow human
beings to adapt to organic and anthropogenic changes in the environment.
Second, that human beings will never surrender the wealth and safety that
technology has afforded and continues to afford them.
People who deny these realities are as clueless as any
“denier” of science. That brings me back to Democrats.
There have been a number of stories predicting that 2020
will finally be the year politicians
start making climate change an important issue. One can only imagine these
reporters started their jobs last week.
It’s true that a number of Democrat presidential hopefuls
have taken “no fossil fuel money” pledges—as if they were going to get any of
that cash anyway—as they spew carbon into the atmosphere searching for another
bad-weather photo-op. Kevin Curtis, the executive director of NRDC Action Fund,
told BuzzFeed News that all of this was “really wicked cool.”
The 2018 midterm elections, adds Anthony Leiserowitz,
director of the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication, are when “climate
change was beginning, for the first time, to play a significant role in a few
races across the country.”
A poll conducted by that very same Yale Program on
Climate Change Communication found that even for the most left-wing voters,
climate change—an imminent planetary tragedy that threatens the existence of
all humanity and most animal species—ranked third on the list of most important
issues. It ranked 17th among all voters, behind things like border security,
tax reform, and terrorism.
Maybe one day the electorate will finally buy in. Climate
change, though, didn’t even make a blip on exit polls of 2018. That is why
Democrats keep ratcheting up the hysteria over every environmental tragedy.
“Climate chaos is here,” declares Merkley, “but it’s not
too late to act.” Remember: When disaster is perpetually ten years away, it’s
never too late to send Democrats some of your money.
No comments:
Post a Comment