By John McCormack
Thursday, May 02, 2019
When Ilhan Omar was asked about Venezuela on Wednesday,
the Minnesota Democrat decided to blame America first.
Back in January, when the United States recognized
National Assembly president Juan Guaidó as president of Venezuela, Omar had
tweeted that socialist dictator Nicolás Maduro was the legitimate leader of the
Venezuelan people, arguing that “the legislature cannot seize power from the
President.” Now, just over three months later, as Maduro’s forces were hard at
work attempting to violently suppress the Guaidó-led uprising of the unarmed
and starving Venezuelan people, Omar was on television, blaming American
“neocons and warmongers” for the crisis.
American policies “kind of helped lead” to “the
devastation in Venezuela,” Omar said in an interview on the news program Democracy Now! “This particular bullying
and the use of sanctions to eventually intervene and make regime change really
does not help the people of countries like Venezuela, and it certainly does not
help and is not in the interest of the United States.”
Omar’s pro-Maduro sentiments make her an outlier within
her own party. Joe Biden tweeted on Tuesday that Maduro’s violence against
protesters was “criminal” and that the “U.S. must stand with the National
Assembly & Guaidó in their efforts to restore democracy through legitimate,
internationally monitored elections.” Nancy Pelosi tweeted that “Maduro needs
to acknowledge the will of the Venezuelan people, whose moving calls for
democracy have been heard around the world.”
“This is one Trump foreign policy that I’ve agreed with
because they had multilateral [support]. That’s what gives it its legitimacy,”
Representative Tom Malinowski (D., N.J.), a former Obama State Department
official, tells National Review. “I
want to increase the pressure. I want to make sure we do it in concert with our
allies.”
So far, Omar hasn’t been joined even by other members of
the far-left wing of the Democratic party, many of whom have offered a muted
response to the Venezuelan uprising. “Violence is horrible,” Representative
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez tells National Review
when asked to comment on the situation. When pressed on whether the Maduro
government is legitimate or Guaidó deserves U.S. support, she adds that she’ll
“defer to caucus leadership on how we navigate this.”
Bernie Sanders, much like Ocasio-Cortez, had no words of
condemnation for the Venezuelan dictator nor words of support for the
Venezuelan people who are risking their lives by taking to the streets. The
Democratic presidential candidate and Vermont senator, who refused to say in
February whether Maduro should step down, has not yet even commented on
Venezuela this week. New Jersey senator and Democratic presidential candidate
Cory Booker similarly says that he has “nothing right now” in the way of
comment on the crisis.
Other Democrats running for president in 2020 have been
more forthcoming, if not particularly unified in their views.
“I have of course supported bringing in the new president
and delegitimizing the Maduro government,” Minnesota senator Amy Klobuchar
says. “You always leave things on the table,” she added when asked about U.S.
intervention.
“We obviously need to advocate for a peaceful end to this
process in a way that sustains [Venezuela’s] democracy,” California senator
Kamala Harris told a reporter Tuesday.
“Neocons/Neolibs & MSM all sing from the same
songsheet: War war war!!!” Hawaii representative Tulsi Gabbard tweeted on
Thursday. “Trump never gets positive media unless he’s threatening war/carrying
out military action. Today, Venezuela. Tomorrow, Iran? Cuba? Who’s next?”
Republicans, meanwhile, remain united in backing the
Trump administration’s policy of support for Guaidó and threats of a blockade
on Cuba if Cuban forces continue to help prop up Maduro.
“We should be putting as much financial pressure as
humanly possible on the corrupt elements of the Maduro regime. Now is the
decisive moment,” Representative Mike Gallagher (R., Wis.) says. “To the extent
we are enhancing our military presence, we have to be working by, with, and
through the Colombians and Brazilians on the ground, and be in lockstep with
our partners. To the extent we are using military assets, it should be to
prevent outside powers — i.e. the Russians, the Cubans, and the Chinese — from aggravating
the conflict.”
“Juan Guaidó has no weapons, no security forces, no
access to funds, no control of media outlets, and he’s able to garner thousands
of people in the streets . . . and almost bring the country to a standstill,”
notes Florida senator Marco Rubio.
“It shouldn’t be
hard for us to support the leader of the one democratically elected body in
Venezuela,” says Representative Dan Crenshaw (R., Texas). “You have . . .
people fighting for their freedom, and it is within the American interest and
the American ideal to support that.”
“This is a classic case of good and evil. I understand
it’s not always that clear-cut in international affairs,” Crenshaw adds. “But
this time it is.”
No comments:
Post a Comment