By David
Harsanyi
Wednesday,
January 31, 2018
Is it
ever acceptable for elected officials to associate with racists? And if they do
associate with racists, is there a statute of limitation on covering the story?
I’m
asking for Republicans. Because after Donald Trump’s first State of the Union
address yesterday, former Klansman and all-around bigots like David Duke and
Richard Spencer tweeted approval of one of the president’s most memorable
lines. A number of journalists, as is their wont, took the opportunity to point
out that white supremacists were cheering on Trump.
Whether or not the president meant it this way, this is how fringe
far-right bigots heard the ‘Dreamers’ line last night. https://twitter.com/drdavidduke/status/958534057159249921
@jaketapper 3:28 PM - JAN 31,
2018
Whether or not the president meant it this way? Well, polls seem to indicate that a
majority of Americans construed Trump’s speech as straightforwardly patriotic,
but obviously, many liberals heard a string of dog whistles instead. Certainly
the line “Americans are dreamers, too,” which refers to debate over the fate of
younger illegal immigrants, is going to be difficult to frame as bigoted when
Trump is offering a generous number of these people a pathway to citizenship —
probably amounting to the largest amnesty in American history.
Whatever
the case, when I saw reporters tweeting out Nazi praise for Trump, I wondered
if any of them had asked Congressional Black Caucus members (many of them boycotting
the State of the Union and readily available to the media) why some of them had
been taped hugging and meeting with the racist conspiracy theorist Louis
Farrakhan?
If you
think this question is a form of “whataboutism” or seems like old news, it’s
not.
It’s
true that no politician has control over who supports him, even if politicians
occasionally instigate that support. I mean, Farrakhan endorsed Barack Obama’s
presidential run in 2008. Hillary Clinton was accused of passive-aggressive
racism for even bringing up the topic. “I did not solicit his support,” the
candidate explained at the time. “I can’t say to somebody that he can’t say
that he thinks I’m a good guy.” Obama was correct, even if his antagonist
policies towards Israel may have pleased the Nation of Islam leader who went to
Iran to celebrate the anniversary for the Islamic Revolution a couple of years
back.
On the
other hand, when Obama posed for a photo with the man who claims white people
are a “race of devils” and said Hitler was a “very great man” at a
Congressional Black Caucus gathering in 2005, it was entirely his fault. We
only found out about the picture recently — and thus the new questions —
because the Congressional Black Caucus allegedly suppressed photos of Democrats
hanging out with a man who spent decades spreading noxious anti-Semitic and
racist conspiracies theories to African-Americans.
Obama is
now gone. There are, however, 45 members in the CBC leading the resistance
against Donald Trump. Four of them — Maxine Waters, Barbara Lee, Al Green, and
William Jefferson — can
been seen here exchanging pleasantries and running through some talking points
on the hurricane Katrina response with Farrakhan in 2009.
If
Waters and Lee boycotted the State of the Union because of Trump’s supposed
racism, isn’t it fair to quiz them on their associations with racists that have
now come to light? As far as I can tell, no major news outlet has asked any of
these heroes of the resistance why it was okay to coordinate a political message
with a man believes that the “lying, murderous Zionist Jews” were behind 9/11.
(If I have missed someone asking, I apologize in advance.)
There’s
already a striking double standard in the coverage of both major political
parties. While every comment from a conservative is parsed for deeper racist
meaning, a former Nation of Islam lackey like Keith Ellison became a rising
star without any real scrutiny over his ugly past by the larger outlets. Is it
bias, or are journalists are too intimidated to ask?
You can
imagine, I’m sure, that if there had been a video of members of Congress
hugging Richard Spencer or David Duke — both whom, incidentally, get most of
their oxygen from media coverage rather than popular support — then boycotted
Hillary Clinton’s State of the Union speech, it would be a massive story. And rightly so.
No comments:
Post a Comment