By Kyle Smith
Thursday, April 27, 2017
If you loved Bill Nye the Science Guy, do yourself a
favor and don’t call up the kiddie entertainer’s new Netflix show Bill Nye Saves the World. Bitter, angry,
shouty, conspiratorial, vulgar, wheedling, given to absurd hyperbole, and blithely
eager to wreak punishment on his enemies, Nye comes across mentally as several
millileters short of a beaker. It’s as if Kermit the Frog somehow morphed into
Michael Moore.
The new show (supposedly aimed at adults but still
written at a grade-school level) uses occasional references to science to
introduce simple political advocacy, broken up by bad jokes and interludes of
actual screaming. This isn’t science but scientism, the invocation of science
in areas where there are legitimate differences of values. “See, you, me we’re
in this together,” Nye tells his audience at the outset of the first episode.
“If we think together and work together, good things are gonna happen.” This
might be a tempting thought to some — “Come, join our mob, happiness will
ensue!” But groupthink isn’t science.
In the first few days after 13 episodes debuted on the
streaming service, two unfortunate moments went disastrously viral. Guest star
Rachel Bloom, the star of Crazy
Ex-Girlfriend, appeared on episode nine to sing an ode to anal sex and
transgenderism, with lyrics such as “Versatile love may have some butt stuff /
It’s evolution, ain’t nothing new / There’s nothing taboo about a sex stew.”
The segment was as off-base scientifically as it was creatively: Good luck
explaining homosexuality in Darwinian terms.
An even more horrifying moment occurred in episode 13,
which is devoted to the supposed problem of overpopulation. Nye featured Travis
Rieder, of Johns Hopkins University, as a guest panelist ethicist. Rieder said
that because people in poor countries (being poor) don’t consume much energy
(even though overpopulation is a driver of climate change), we should direct
our population-control efforts at the rich world, where the population isn’t
growing, instead of at the poor world, where it is. This would, he reasoned, be
the best way of reducing global energy demands.
Even though in Niger the average woman has seven
children, Rieder said, “our two kids are way more problematic!”
Congratulations, Travis Rieder’s children, your dad thinks your very existence
regrettable. Next time you’re standing on a ledge, don’t let Dad sneak up
behind you.
“So should we have policies that penalize people for having
extra kids in the developed world?” Nye asks. “I do think that we should at
least consider it,” Rieder replies blandly. “‘At least consider it’ is, like,
‘Do it!’” Nye responds, a demonic glint in his eye. Another panelist, Dr. Nerys
Benfield, director of family planning at Montefiore Medical Center, spots a
whiff of eugenics here: “We’ve gone down that road before and who winds up
being penalized? It’s poor women, minorities, disabled women. . . . So we
really have not come at it from a place of justice necessarily in the past.”
Frightening as this portion of the show is, it
immediately follows a segment that consists of an urgent call for
government-guaranteed maternity leave in the United States — the opposite of
penalizing people for having kids in the developed world. The U.S. is presented
as an outlier on this matter by a correspondent who had traveled all the way to
Bangalore, India, to celebrate India’s maternity-leave policy.
The consecutive segments are in such flat contradiction
with each other’s politics that the only way to make sense of them is to find
the common element: U.S. bad; developing world good. Never mind that India is
one of the world’s worst countries in which to be a woman or that Niger is one
of the worst places on earth. Being a global-minded progressive American today
means neo-Rousseauian fantasies that things are much better in the world’s most
impoverished places.
Nye’s chief obsession these days is climate change — the
politics of it, not the science. After a ludicrous skit in which the Victoria’s
Secret model Karlie Kloss presents climate change as causing the imminent
vanishing of coffee, chocolate, and fish (“Warming waters and ocean
acidification are destroying all the fish supplies — like, all the fish,” she
tells us), he lets loose with a rant about “climate-change deniers.” “These
people,” he says, “have managed to get across the idea that somehow scientific
uncertainty, plus or minus 2 or 3 percent, is the same as plus or minus 100
percent. It’s just wrong!” He pleads for the U.S. to be the world leader on the
issue and says it could be done “if we were exporting the culture of ‘Climate
change — serious business — we’re gonna get to work on this — we’re gonna have
renewable energy — we’re gonna have clean water for everyone and access to
electronic information for everyone in the world.’”
How did providing clean water and getting everyone hooked
up to the Internet come into this picture? Never mind. The U.S. is, of course,
already providing huge subsidies for renewables. A serious, sustained,
nationwide effort to reduce greenhouse emissions is already long under way:
U.S. carbon dioxide emissions are at their lowest point in a quarter of a
century, and world emissions were flat last year. Thanks to a combination of
regulatory punishment and market forces, especially the huge increase in U.S.
natural-gas production via fracking and other methods, coal is rapidly being
driven out of the U.S. economy.
None of this, alas, has much of an effect on global
temperatures; nor will proposed fixes such as the Paris Climate Accord do much
to alter the trajectory of global temperatures. So humanity will have to adapt
to climate change, while people like Nye are ranting and raving and suggesting
anyone who isn’t ranting and raving with equal fervor should face the same fate
as Enron executives who went to jail. Climate change and what to do about it
are frustratingly complicated matters, but the pleasure of identifying and
castigating enemies is so simple that a child can understand it. I look forward
to the day when Netflix presents Pee-Wee’s
White-Privilege Playhouse.
No comments:
Post a Comment