By Ben Shapiro
Wednesday, April 26, 2017
On Saturday, leftists around the nation took to the streets
to sound off about their new religion: Science™! No, not testable hypotheses
and well-constructed experiments. Science™! You know, like gay rights and
abortion and global redistributionism and dying polar bears ’n’ stuff.
Leading the charge was eminent scientific revolutionary
Bill Nye the Science Guy, a mechanical-engineering-degree holder who got famous
as a children’s television presenter. Nye was a keynoter at the March for
Science, where he stated, “We are marching today to remind people everywhere,
our lawmakers especially, of the significance of science for our health and
prosperity.” What sort of science was Nye standing up to defend? Budget
increases for the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Institutes
of Health, of course! He explained how all of this was scientific and not
political: “Somewhere along the way, there has developed this idea that if you
believe something hard enough, it’s as true as things discovered through the
process of science. And I will say that’s objectively wrong.”
Belief isn’t science.
This is a good point.
Unfortunately, Nye followed up his widely praised
appearance at the March for Science by unleashing a video that destroyed the
Internet, from his new show Bill Nye
Saves the World. He trotted out Crazy
Ex-Girlfriend actress Rachel Bloom to sing a “very special” song (Nye’s
words). She warbled:
My vagina has its own voice / Not
vocal cords, a metaphorical voice / Sometimes I do a voice for my vagina . .
. / ’Cause my sex junk is so oh, oh, oh /
Much more than either or, or or / Power bottom or power top / Versatile love
may have some butt stuff / It’s evolution, ain’t nothing new / There’s nothing
taboo about a sex stew . . . If they’re alive, I’ll date ’em / Channing or
Jenna Tatum / I’m down for anything / Don’t box in my box.
Science™!
If this seems rather unscientific to you — if you wonder
why a talking vagina with obvious self-control problems is being trotted out by
the self-proclaimed Science Guy — you’re not alone. You’re rational. You might
even be using some scientific thinking. But this is demonstrative of the Left’s
take on science: Science is actually just the name for anything the Left likes.
Worried about the humanity of an unborn child? Concerned that fetuses have
their own blood types and their own DNA? Stop it! You’re quoting science, not
Science™! Wondering how it is that a genetic male is actually a woman? You’re
worrying about science, not Science™!
This is the dirty little secret of the Left’s sudden
embrace of Science™ — it’s not science
they support, but religion. They
support that which they believe but cannot prove and do not care about proving.
Bill Nye isn’t interested in a scientific debate about global warming — how
much is occurring, the measurement techniques at issue, the sensitivity of the
climate to carbon emissions, the range of factors that affect the climate. He
wants you to accept his version of the truth — not just that global warming is
happening, but that massive government intervention is necessary in order to
avert imminent global catastrophe.
Such government solutions aren’t verifiably scientific.
They are speculative. But that speculation has costs, particularly to the most
impoverished people on the planet, who benefit from cheap carbon-based fuels.
Even if you accept the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change estimate
that sea levels will rise by two feet over the course of the rest of the
century and the temperature will rise about 7 degrees Fahrenheit, there is
reason to question, as Oren
Cass points out, whether or not massive government intervention is
necessary or even justifiable.
But the Left refuses to acknowledge such questions. It
makes you a “denier” to disagree with the Left’s conclusions, just as it makes
you a cruel person to wonder whether gun control will actually lower the
American murder rate. Science, in other words, is just a baton for the Left.
A decade ago, the Left declared President Bush
anti-science for his restrictions on the use of new federally funded
fetal-stem-cell lines. They claimed that Bush hated science, that fetal stem
cells were the wave of the future, that Bush was a “moral ayatollah,” in the
words of Senator Tom Harkin (D., Iowa). Democrats ran on the promise that if
Bush were thrown out of office in 2004, they’d make Christopher Reeve walk again
using fetal stem cells. But it turned out that fetal stem cells were
unnecessary to scientific research — scientists came up with an embryo-free
process to produce genetically matched stem cells. As Charles Krauthammer, no
religious fundamentalist, wrote at the time: “Rarely has a president — so
vilified for a moral stance — been so thoroughly vindicated. Why? Precisely
because he took a moral stance.”
In other words, Bush didn’t rely on science to give him
his values. Nor should he have. Science is incapable of making value-laden
decisions. There are plenty of ob-gyns who know better than the most pro-life
conservative just how complex life is in the womb, yet they will perform
abortions — science hasn’t dictated their behavior. The Nazis were famously pro-science,
declaring that science itself mandated the killing of the “unfit” for the
strengthening of the race; their racism was supposedly scientific.
That’s why the March for Science is such foolishness. If
the march were simply focused on advocacy for increased EPA funding, that would
be political, not scientific; if the marchers were demanding more funding for
the NIH, that too would be political, but with a stronger scientific component.
But the March for Science was actually a march for Science™: The Leftist
Religion — and that leftist religion isn’t interested in science in the
slightest. It’s simplistic and simple-minded virtue signaling.
No comments:
Post a Comment