By Evelyn Gordon
Thursday, April 07, 2016
Something truly shocking happened this week: A UN
official publicly
called out Hamas for “stealing from their own people and adding to the
suffering of Palestinians in Gaza.” The shocking part is that someone from the
UN actually bothered to comment. Usually, international officials prefer to
ignore such malfeasance, lest admitting it undercut their claim that
Palestinian suffering is Israel’s fault. Yet exacerbating Palestinian suffering
is actually standard practice for both Hamas and the Palestinian Authority, as
demonstrated by several media reports from the past two weeks alone.
The incident that outraged Nickolay Mladenov, the UN’s
special coordinator for the Middle East peace process, came to light last
Friday when Israel suspended shipments of cement to Gaza’s private sector. A
senior Hamas official had been confiscating sizable portions of those shipments
for the organization’s own use – i.e., to build tunnels with which to attack
Israel. By seizing cement earmarked for the private sector, Hamas was violating
the terms set by international donors, who are funding Gaza’s reconstruction
after the Hamas-Israel war of 2014. Moreover, as Mladenov pointed out on
Monday, this cement is critically needed to rebuild the houses damaged or
destroyed in that war and “to enable much-needed infrastructure and development
projects” in impoverished Gaza, where the unemployment rate stood at 38.4
percent in fourth-quarter 2015. Hence, his rare outburst against Hamas.
But the ongoing water crisis in Gaza has not elicited
such passion. As Haaretz reporter
Amira Hass noted ten days before the cement shipments were suspended, a
whopping 95 percent of tap water in Gaza is already undrinkable due to
over-pumping. The UN foresees irreversible damage to the aquifer by 2020. As Hass
correctly argued, the quickest and cheapest way to solve Gaza’s water shortage
would be to buy more water from Israel, but the PA rejects this solution.
Instead, it’s working with international donors to build a desalination plant,
which won’t be ready for years.
The official reason for this decision is a desire to
reduce Palestinian dependence on Israel. But as Hass, who can’t be accused of
pro-Israel sentiment, pointed out, the PA “has no problem buying more water
from Israel for the West Bank – 50 million cubic meters annually, double what
is specified in the Oslo Accords.” Therefore, she wrote, the PA’s real reason
apparently lies elsewhere:
It fears that the Hamas government
will not bother to pay the water bills, as has happened with the electricity
bill. Israel will then deduct what is owed directly from the customs duties it
collects for the PA and transfers to Ramallah. Once again, the Palestinian
people are trapped by the Fatah-Hamas feud.
In short, Gaza is suffering a completely preventable
humanitarian crisis because the Palestinians’ two rival governments can’t agree
on who should pay for more water. Yet the international silence has been
deafening.
On the same day that Hass’s column appeared, Israel Hayom reported on the abandonment
of an Israeli-Palestinian business center located at a crossing between
Palestinian- and Israeli-controlled sections of the West Bank. The center was
supposed to facilitate Israeli-Palestinian business by providing a place where
businessmen could meet without the Palestinians having to go through the
bureaucracy of obtaining a permit to enter Israel.
One might think this is something the PA would want to
encourage. After all, the West Bank needs more business opportunities; its
growth rate in the fourth quarter of 2015 was an anemic 1.0 percent, and its
official unemployment rate stood at 18.7 percent. Moreover, Israel is a logical
place to look for such opportunities. It’s already the PA’s main trading partner
and the only one of its neighbors with a developed economy.
Instead, the center has been closed since the wave of
Palestinian stabbing attacks against Israel began in October 2015 – not because
Israel shut it down, but because the PA forbade Palestinians to go there.
Presumably, having spent the previous month hurling vile slanders such as that
Israel was committing “genocide” and that Jews were “desecrating” Al-Aqsa
Mosque with their “filthy feet,” PA President Mahmoud Abbas had to show he was
working to prevent “normalization” with such a terrible country so as to
placate the anti-normalization thugs who routinely try to shut down every form
of Israeli-Palestinian cooperation; from private-sector conferences on
coexistence to Palestinian franchises of Israeli clothing chains.
Closing the center didn’t hurt Israel, whose economy
isn’t dependent on the Palestinians; it primarily hurt the Palestinians
themselves, who need the jobs joint Israeli-Palestinian ventures could provide.
But once again, the international community had nothing to say.
The above examples — and there are countless others — are
important even if you (wrongly) blame the lack of a Palestinian state entirely
on Israel, because they show that even if Israel left the West Bank tomorrow,
it would solve very few of the Palestinians’ problems. An Israeli withdrawal
wouldn’t make Hamas stop stealing cement from its people; it wouldn’t end the
PA-Hamas feud over who should pay Palestinian water bills, and it wouldn’t stop
the PA from impeding its people’s business activity.
Thus, anyone who actually wants to see a functioning
Palestinian state emerge would be better off focusing less on an immediate
Israeli withdrawal and more on improving Palestinian governance. Otherwise,
based on the record of both the PA and Hamas to date, any Palestinian state
that did arise would be just another failed Arab state. And another failed Arab
state are the last thing the world needs right now.
No comments:
Post a Comment