By Rich Cromwell
Monday, April 11, 2016
In light of Mississippi’s decision to pass a religious
freedom bill, Bryan Adams cancelled an upcoming show at the Mississippi Coast
Coliseum. The performer follows in the footsteps of Bruce Springsteen and
PayPal, which pulled out of North Carolina over the state’s recently passed bathroom
ordinance.
Adams, known for hits such as “(Everything I Do) I Do It
For You” from heteronormative classic “Robin Hood,” performed in Arkansas in
September 2015. Arkansas passed its own religious freedom bill in April 2015.
Granted, Arkansas’ bill has not played out as opponents predicted and
restaurants continue to serve people regardless of sexual orientation, because
that’s not what religious freedom bills are about. A Muslim prisoner in the
state also benefited from a religious freedom bill, albeit the federal version
signed by President Bill Clinton. Maybe Adams is taking a nuanced stand.
Actually, no, he isn’t. It seems Adams isn’t so troubled
enough about bigotry to skip countries where women and members of the LGBT
community are jailed and abused.
Springsteen, to his credit, does not have a history of
cashing checks from shows in such countries and did play the role of actual
dissident in East Berlin in 1988. Alas, Springsteen’s musical decline has been
“obvious for decades,” which stretches back to the late ‘80s, so perhaps
“Howard Zinn with a guitar” can be given a tad more leeway for finding a way to
remind people other than nostalgic Baby Boomers that he does, in fact, continue
to exist.
PayPal, on the other hand, doesn’t need such reminders.
It also does not have quite as clean a record on where the company chooses to
do business. As noted by North Carolina Rep. Robert Pittenger, “PayPal does
business in 25 countries where homosexual behavior is illegal, including 5
countries where the penalty is death, yet they object to the North Carolina
legislature overturning a misguided ordinance about letting men in to the
women’s bathroom? Perhaps PayPal would like to try and clarify this seemingly
very hypocritical position.”
Nah, clarification is unnecessary. It’s all virtue
signaling and Selma envy. That is, these aging rockers and various corporations
may pine for free love and the summer of ’69, but they only really care insofar
as people know they’re good without requiring them to actually put their money
where their mouths are. Otherwise, they would boycott large swathes of the
world rather than focusing on a couple of states where women and
LGBT-identifying folks are free to live their lives without the state coming
after them.
But that would require more than posturing and waiting
for the tempest in a teacup to pass. It would require actual financial loss and
commitment rather than hypocritical preening over the latest new political
battle. Of course, maybe they actually mean it this time. As we can learn from
Adams and Arkansas, let’s check back in about five months and see just how courageous
those convictions are. I’m sure this time they totally mean it.
No comments:
Post a Comment