National Review Online
Saturday, April 23, 2016
The Americans for Prosperity Foundation, a
conservative-oriented nonprofit, has won a victory in its lawsuit against
California attorney general Kamala Harris, who is attempting to do with her
investigatory powers what Lois Lerner did with the IRS’s: weaponize them for
political purposes.
Harris is running for the Senate. She is a Democrat. AFP
is associated with the Koch brothers and with any number of public-policy
disputes that have left Democrats bruised and defeated. Nonprofits register
federally with the IRS, and also with the states in which they are active.
Harris, right around the time she decided she wanted to become a senator, also
decided that the paperwork AFP and other conservative organizations had been
filing for years in California was insufficient, and she demanded — this will
not surprise you — a list of major donors.
Democrats have a long and ugly history of abusing such
information. The most dramatic recent episode involved the IRS’s intentional
leaking of documents belonging to the National Association for Marriage, in
order to facilitate harassment of and retaliation against private citizens who
had the bad taste to agree with Senator Obama about gay marriage and invest 20
bucks in the pursuit of their consciences. After a long and expensive legal
fight, the IRS was forced to admit that it had in fact leaked the NOM
documents, and it paid $50,000 to NOM in restitution. Did anybody lose his job
over this? Of course not. In fact, Republican members of Congress are in a rage
at the moment over the fact that the IRS has rehired hundreds of workers
dismissed for improper conduct, including improper handling of private
documents.
Harris made no persuasive case that this information was
necessary for the enforcement of California tax law; in the event that such
information should become relevant, California authorities have the power to
obtain donor information via subpoena. The most charitable interpretation would
be that this isn’t about investigation of a crime but pre-investigation of a
pre-crime — Minority Report as
performed in Sacramento — but in this case, charity would lead us astray. This
was a straight-up attempt at political suppression.
AFP convinced the federal district court that Harris’s
request served no legitimate purpose and was part of a political campaign by
Democrats against conservative organizations. It demonstrated, among other
things, that government agencies had “systematically failed to maintain the
confidentiality of Schedule B forms” containing donor information and other
financial data.
This is not an investigation that would have an
incidental chilling effect on free speech and political activism; the chilling
effect is the entire point.
From Texas to New York to California to the U.S. Virgin
Islands, this country is beset by out-of-control Democratic prosecutors
attempting to criminalize dissent. Former Texas governor Rick Perry was charged
with two felonies (since laughed out of court) for having vetoed a bill that he
had promised to veto, angering Austin Democrats; the libertarian-leaning
Competitive Enterprise Institute has been subpoenaed for private communication
related to its global-warming activism; Harris and her New York counterpart,
Eric Schneiderman, are up to their armpits in a scheme to prosecute Exxon for
its funding of global-warming activism or, short of that, to shake it down for
a large settlement. Democratic activists cooperating with corrupt judges in
Ecuador tried the same thing with Chevron. These are, put plainly, attempts to
prosecute political opponents for their politics — attacks on the First
Amendment and on the very principle of citizen engagement in the democratic
process. AFP has won this round, but the fight continues on many other fronts.
No comments:
Post a Comment