By Claire Lehmann
Sunday, December 08, 2024
Two days after Hamas massacred 1,200 Israelis, I was
sitting at my desk in the Sydney Central Business District. Zoe, my colleague,
stood up from her desk with a worried look. Holding her phone, she told me that
the New South Wales Board of Deputies had received a police warning: the safety
of Jews in the city could not be guaranteed. The message she had just received
was encouraging them to leave.
That message, combined with the knowledge of an upcoming
pro-Palestinian protest in the city, made me feel something that I’d never felt
before as an Australian citizen. I felt queasy as I remembered other times when
Jews had felt safe in their own cities—then suddenly no longer.
It was during that moment of fear that I realised what
antisemitism really was. Not being Jewish myself, I had never had a personal
connection with the Holocaust. My knowledge of antisemitism was purely
theoretical and abstract. It was a phenomenon I had read about in books, seen
in films and documentaries, but it hit me that day like a slap to the face. I
realised that antisemitism is two things: active, vicious hatred and cool
institutional indifference towards that hate. And it was that institutional indifference
that made me feel afraid.
The vicious hate manifested that night when a mob
congregated on the steps of the Opera House chanting “where’s the Jews,” “fuck
the Jews,” and “fuck Israel.” But what unnerved me was the indifference of
authorities who had permitted this celebratory march from Sydney Town Hall in
the first place. This was compounded when only one person was arrested at that
rally where flags were burned—and that was a bystander carrying an Israeli
flag.
Since that day, Australia’s Prime Minister, Anthony
Albanese has followed the model of indifference shown by the NSW Police. He
says “antisemitism has no place in Australia,” while anti-Israel protesters
freely demonstrate in front of synagogues. He takes no responsibility for
surging attacks on Jews while simultaneously undermining the world’s only
Jewish state. While Albanese might not be personally antisemitic, his
intentional paralysis speaks of something more damning.
***
In the early hours of Friday morning, a synagogue in the
Melbourne suburb of Ripponlea was firebombed. Worshippers who were inside the
building fled for safety. Built by Holocaust survivors, the synagogue was the
Adass Israel congregation’s place of worship. The fire destroyed irreplaceable
Torah scrolls passed down through generations, leaving the building gutted.
A
timeline published by The Australian this weekend exposes the timid
response from Australia’s leaders. Albanese said nothing when a mob descended
upon Central Shule Chabad Synagogue in Melbourne’s East on the anniversary of
Kristallnacht. He said nothing when an anti-Israel convoy drove through
Sydney’s Eastern suburbs, home to many Jewish Australians. He remained silent
when families of Israeli hostages fled from protesters who ambushed them,
calling them “baby killers.” No response came when a Melbourne professor had
his office stormed, protesters calling him a “war criminal” for working with an
Israeli University. Silence again when former Olympian, Australian Senator, and
Indigenous woman Nova Peris was surrounded by an intimidating mob at the Great
Synagogue in Sydney.
The silence extends beyond government. While major
corporations and cultural institutions rush to signal their virtues on climate
change and the Voice, they remain conspicuously silent when Jews face actual
violence and threats to their physical safety. This isn’t about social
exclusion or verbal slights that we normally associate with prejudice. It’s
about institutional paralysis when synagogues burn, when Jewish MPs have their
offices vandalised, and when mobs celebrate the massacre of Jews in Australian streets.
The threat is immediate and physical, yet the response remains tepid.
This institutional indifference stems from a perverse
logic: Jews are seen as too successful to be victims. Their relative
educational and economic achievements are held against them, transforming
antisemitism into what some view as legitimate political protest. Left-wing
leaders, trained to spot hatred born of contempt, are blind to hatred born of
envy. Their framework for understanding oppression breaks down when the
targeted group is successful.
This is why Anthony Albanese cannot move beyond
platitudes or convey authority on an issue that requires leadership. Many in
the Labor Party cannot recognise that a group that is (on average) highly
educated and successful can be victimised precisely because of their success.
Rushing to champion Indigenous and LGBTQA+ issues, our left-leaning leaders
fall mute when confronting violent hatred directed at Jewish Australians. Their
ideological framework, built around power differentials and systemic oppression,
leaves them paralysed when faced with mob violence against a minority group
that doesn’t fit their pro forma templates. But this blindness to success-based
persecution isn’t just a philosophical failure—it betrays the basic duty to
protect all citizens from violence.
Of course, one may argue these Labor politicians are
simply responding to electoral demographics, particularly in seats with
significant Muslim Australian populations. And the outrage over Israel’s
military response in Gaza and Netanyahu’s policies deserves expression in a
democratic society. Nevertheless, our leaders have failed to draw a crucial
line: while criticism of Israeli policy is legitimate, calls for Israel’s
destruction cross into explicit antisemitism. When protesters march with “From
the River to the Sea” placards, display Hamas and Hezbollah symbols, and demand
Israel’s elimination, they’re promoting ethnic hatred that directly threatens
Jewish Australians who have no say in Israeli policy. Our leaders’ reluctance
to point out this distinction has left Australian Jews vulnerable to
intimidation and violence that has nothing to do with criticising Israel.
The firebombing of the Adass Israel Synagogue—a place built by Holocaust survivors seeking refuge from persecution—shows where institutional indifference leads. When our leaders fail to draw clear lines between legitimate political discourse and naked Jew hate, when they treat attacks on Jewish Australians as a low priority, they create the conditions that we learn about in history books. The vicious hatred may come from a militant few, but it’s the silent majority—particularly those in positions of power and influence—who let it spread. For Jewish Australians, their grandparents’ stories must no longer feel like stories of a distant nightmare but lessons in a fear that never ends.
No comments:
Post a Comment