By Rich Lowry
Friday, December 20, 2024
It feels like 2013 again.
Back then, a beleaguered Republican speaker of the House
was forced into a government shutdown by firebrands in his caucus who
considered him insufficiently pure.
A revolution in GOP politics has happened since, and yet
a beleaguered Republican speaker of the House has been forced to the verge of a government shutdown by firebrands in his
caucus who consider him insufficiently pure.
The difference is that Mike Johnson — unlike his
predecessor, John Boehner — isn’t just dealing with an internal revolt; he also
had the most powerful Republican politician on the planet and his extremely
influential sidekick blast his handiwork, namely, Donald Trump and Elon Musk,
respectively.
Johnson did make a misstep with the so-called continuing
resolution to keep the government funded past a looming deadline. In
negotiations, he let it balloon into a true monstrosity. What was supposed to
be a stopgap measure to avoid a government shutdown became a vehicle to pass
new legislation in a last-minute, 1,500-page bill that no one was going to
read.
The yet-to-be-resolved episode shows that Republican
hostility to spending still exists a decade after Tea Party Republicans roiled
the establishment — and made Boehner’s life miserable — demanding massive
deficit reduction.
Now, though, this reflex has taken a new form. It is
expressed in fierce opposition to “the swamp” — in this case, business-as-usual
logrolling in Congress — and excitement about the prospects for Musk’s DOGE,
the new Department of Government Efficiency.
The bipartisan agreement in Washington, D.C., to
perpetually spend more money is indeed disgraceful, and DOGE could be a welcome
force for new thinking. Yet both of these are really beside the point when
considering the red ink that one day — probably not tomorrow and maybe not even
several years from now — could cause a horrendous fiscal crisis.
There are idiotic programs and senseless regulations
aplenty, but the money that can be found in the federal couch cushions is
relatively minimal. Most federal spending has strong public backing, and so a
$6.8 trillion budget that looks like a juicy target is very hard to bring under
control.
The math is as brutal as ever. Social Security and
Medicare, together with veterans’ benefits and other health programs, account
for more than half of the budget. One of Trump’s signature promises, of course,
is not to touch Medicare and Social Security. Then, interest on the debt and
defense spending take up about another $2 trillion.
What’s left is, in the scheme of things, a pittance, and
even programs in this category have constituencies.
If the budget is ever to be put on a more rational basis,
there is no substitute for making a public case for a serious reform agenda
that includes entitlements like Social Security and Medicare. This is a
politically perilous project, which is why the Republican Party abandoned it.
How much easier and satisfying it is to tank flagrantly absurd end-of-year
spending bills and to put extravagant hopes in DOGE.
It is telling what else was happening in Washington while
Mike Johnson’s continuing resolution went down in flames. Congress was busy
working to pass, on a bipartisan basis, the Social Security Fairness Act at a
cost of roughly $200 billion over ten years. It doesn’t matter that the
legislation is a poorly designed giveaway to public employees that experts
across the spectrum think is a bad idea.
DOGE will be hard-pressed just to claw that money back.
Musk and Ramaswamy have talked about cutting a swath of federal workers.
According to the Congressional Budget Office, in 2022, the federal government
employed 2.3 million civilians at a cost of $271 billion. So if you can cut 10
percent of those employees, which would be a stunning accomplishment, you might
cover the ten-year cost of the Social Security Fairness Act, but you are still
treading fiscal water.
This points to another similarity with 2013. All the
drama and chaos is unlikely to fundamentally alter our dreadful fiscal
trajectory.
No comments:
Post a Comment