By James B. Meigs
Sunday, December 22, 2024
‘Dunkelflaute” is one of those lovely German compound
words. It means “dark doldrums,” a stretch of cloudy weather with no wind. It
doesn’t sound so bad. You might even think, Well, it’s cold and cloudy, but
at least there’s no wind! But if you think that way, it’s because you are
not in charge of Germany’s increasingly dysfunctional power grid.
You see, Germany has spent more than 20 years trying to
reinvent how a modern industrial country makes electricity. Partly to burnish
their green credentials, and partly due to pressure from the country’s leftist
Green Party, German officials have invested about 600 billion euros trying to
phase out coal and nuclear power and replace it mostly with wind turbines and
solar panels.
They tell us it works pretty well—until it doesn’t. On
good days, the country gets most of its power from renewable energy. Consumers
might pay some of the highest electricity prices in Europe, but at least they
know they are pioneering the “energy transition.” But then there’s the Dunkelflaute.
A few days of dark doldrums this past November sent electricity prices soaring
to their highest level since the start of the Ukraine war. Grid operators
rushed to spin up gas- and coal-fired electric plants and even resorted to
burning oil (an absurdly expensive fallback). “We were on our last legs,” one
energy analyst told reporters.
It could have been worse. History shows that every five
years or so, northern Europe gets a cloudy, still period that lasts a week or
longer. And these tend to fall in cold months, when people also burn more gas
to heat their houses. Today, after Germany has shut down all its nuclear and
many of its coal and gas plants, such an extended Dunkelflaute could
lead to blackouts. There’s just not enough backup power.
In short, Germany has put its entire electric grid at
risk in pursuit of becoming the world’s climate champion. (Ironically, while
the country’s greenhouse emissions have declined, they haven’t fallen as fast
as those in the U.S., which has been less aggressive in rolling out renewable
energy and which is trying to revive, rather than banish, nuclear power.)
Germany is an industrial nation, with thousands of factories turning out
everything from sportswear (Adidas) to pharmaceuticals (Bayer) to luxury cars (Mercedes-Benz).
And, while this might be news to Germany’s green policymakers, factories run on
electricity. Chronically high energy prices are bad for business. The risk of
blackouts is worse. The country’s manufacturing sector is struggling.
German industrial output is down almost 20 percent since
2017. VW, the country’s largest employer, recently cut worker pay by 10 percent
and is planning to close at least three factories. The steel giant Thyssenkrupp
plans to cut about 40 percent of its workforce by the end of the decade. And
the overall German economy has been shrinking for the past two years.
Dark doldrums indeed.
We think of Germans as sober, disciplined people. How did
they get themselves into this mess? Well, they listened to Green Party
radicals, for one thing. Europe’s Green Party movement got its start in the
1970s when activists hit the streets protesting both nuclear weapons and
nuclear power. (They didn’t see much of a difference.) Unlike traditional
socialists, who profess to care about the kind of people who work in factories,
the greens had a fuzzier, crunchier philosophy. They liked organic food and were
suspicious of big business, modern medicine, and high technology.
This kind of worldview is still popular today. In the
U.S., it often goes under the name “climate justice,” a movement that tries to
meld concern about global warming with the full panoply of far-left,
intersectional causes. The Berkeley, California–based Climate Justice Alliance,
for example, proclaims on its website that “the path to climate justice travels
through a free Palestine.” Last year, I wrote
a report for the Manhattan Institute about the Biden administration’s
sweeping environmental- and climate-justice policies. I discovered that, while
Biden ran for the presidency as an old-school moderate, once in office he
embraced all sorts of kookiness. To advise his team on environmental justice
(EJ) policy, for example, the White House put together a committee that
included the Climate Justice Alliance and other radical activists.
Like the European greens, these groups offer a warm,
misty vision of the kind of post-capitalist world they seek. The Climate
Justice Alliance says it supports a “Just Transition away from extractive
systems of production, consumption and political oppression, and towards
resilient, regenerative and equitable economies.” They describe a world in
which poor neighborhoods become neo-pastoral collectives where food is grown in
community gardens, electricity is produced and distributed locally, and wealth
is shared. Biden’s EJ advisers also have some strong ideas about what kind of
world they don’t want, advising the White House to “sunset investment by
2030 in fossil fuels, plastics, dangerous chemicals and nuclear energy.”
I learned that these activists aren’t very concerned
about whether their policies actually bring down emissions. For them, the “just
transition” doesn’t just mean substituting, say, low-carbon energy for coal. It
means a transition from what they see as a harsh, exploitative capitalist
system to a gentle, collaborative one. Renewable energy—and solar power in
particular—is a big part of this movement. Climate-justice activists see
concentrated sources of energy as part of the old oppressive system. They advocate
instead for “decentralized energy,” with solar panels sprouting on every
rooftop in poor communities and local groups deciding how that power should be
distributed. (Never mind that urban rooftop solar is far more expensive per
kilowatt-hour produced than big rural solar farms. Efficiency isn’t the real
goal for these crusaders; they care about “community empowerment.”)
The Biden administration listened to these
climate-justice advisers and made sure the Inflation Reduction Act included $7
billion in a Solar for All program. That program funds grassroots groups that
say they want to “help community members install and use solar power,” as one
Austin, Texas, nonprofit puts it. That’s just one of many Biden programs
showering billions on leftist green groups.
Germany’s Green Party was way ahead of American activists
when it came to hijacking climate concerns as a tool for radical change. They
also have their own version of the “just transition,” the Energiewende,
literally “energy transition,” which calls for phasing out every form of energy
the left doesn’t like. And, like the left-wing activists Biden invited into the
White House, Germany’s greens managed to convince the country’s supposedly
serious political elite to implement their anti-industrialist scheme.
Over more than two decades, Angela Merkel and other
putatively centrist politicians didn’t only embrace Energiewende, they
bragged about it at every Davos meeting. Germany was going to show the world
what climate leadership looked like. Even when prices rose and energy shortages
loomed, Merkel’s government doubled down, backing expensive offshore wind farms
and closing the last of Germany’s clean, safe nuclear plants.
Now it’s all falling apart. The European business press
talks about the “Energiewende disaster.”
Even the government is falling apart. The coalition led
by Merkel’s successor, Olaf Scholz, has collapsed, largely due to concerns
about the failing economy. I’m not so sure the old greens who got the Energiewende
ball rolling think it’s a disaster, though. They never much liked factories, or
high technology, or the capitalist system itself. They always thought the
modern world was too consumerist, too technology-hungry, too modern. If
people have to go back to heating their homes with firewood, that suits the
greens just fine.
There’s a lesson here for American leaders: Never let
people who hate you and your economic system lecture you about policy. And
never go full Europe.
No comments:
Post a Comment