By Charles C. W. Cooke
Wednesday, December 11, 2024
It’s always the “but” that gets you. There you are,
hurtling through the start of the sentence, making all the right points, saying
all the necessary things, conveying all that needs to be conveyed, and then,
Bam!, out comes that pesky coordinating conjunction that ruins the exercise in
an instant. In her revolting statement on the assassination of Brian Thompson, the former CEO of
UnitedHealthcare, Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts fell prey to this
trap. “Violence is never the answer,” Warren said. “But,” she continued,
“people can only be pushed so far.”
Ah.
As one might have augured, Warren’s “but” was the
overture to a catastrophic series of statements that, taken together, rendered
all that came before them entirely moot. The killing represented “a warning,”
Warren suggested,
that if you push people hard
enough they lose faith in the ability of their government to make change, lose
faith in the ability of the people who are providing the health care to make
change, and start to take matters into their own hands in ways that will
ultimately be a threat to everyone.
There’s a word for this sort of argument in the expansive
English language. That word is “justification.”
Contrast Warren’s words with those from her fellow
Democratic senator, John Fetterman of Pennsylvania. About the murderer,
Fetterman said, “He’s the asshole that’s going to die in prison.” About those
celebrating him online, Fetterman said, “A sewer is going to sewer: that’s what
social media is about.” About the mainstream press’s sympathetic takes,
Fetterman said, “I don’t know why the media wants to turn that into a story,
just with these trolls saying these kinds of things anonymously like that.” His
conclusion was perfect: “Remember,” Fetterman advised, “he has two children
that are going to grow up without their father. It’s vile. And if you’ve gunned
someone down that you don’t happen to agree with their views or the business
that they’re in, hey, you know, I’m next, they’re next, he’s next, she’s next.”
Americans seeking good examples should resolve to be a
Fetterman rather than a Warren.
The results of the 2024 elections have accorded the
Democrats the opportunity to wonder who they are and to debate who they ought
to be. The contrast on display between John Fetterman and Elizabeth Warren
might be useful in that endeavor. Broadly speaking, the Elizabeth Warrens of
the world do not help the Democrats win power or advance their ideas. Broadly
speaking, the John Fettermans of the world help to achieve both. Were an alien
to descend into America in the hope of discerning some patterns in our politics,
one trend he would swiftly sniff out is that the country does not much like
aloof Massachusetts progressives. Along with Minnesota, which produced both
Hubert Humphrey and Walter Mondale, Massachusetts’s modern claim to fame is
that it produced Michael Dukakis and John Kerry. There is, it seems, something
in the way that lefties from Massachusetts behave that gives the electorate the
heebie-jeebies. By excusing murder, Elizabeth Warren has confirmed that this
habit will be tough to break.
As a matter of fact, one can construct a plausible case
that Elizabeth Warren and her batty worldview are directly responsible for many
of the Democrats’ current woes. It was Warren’s lurch into extremism that
inspired Kamala Harris to adopt many of the positions she promulgated in 2019 —
positions that Harris struggled to shed during this year’s presidential
election. And it was the coterie of Warren-inspired White House staffers who
successfully seized the moderate Joe Biden after his winning 2020 campaign and
transformed him into a myopically left-wing president whom a majority of
Americans came to loathe. It should perhaps have been obvious that Warren was a
crank when she started tweeting
out sentiments such as, “Black trans and cis women, gender-nonconforming,
and nonbinary people are the backbone of our democracy” without having first
been threatened with waterboarding. But if it was not clear then, the
consequences of her influence have now made the indictment clear. Warren is a
disaster for her party, a disaster for America, and a disaster for the basic
human decency that we are entitled to expect from our politicians — no ifs or
buts apply.
No comments:
Post a Comment