By Noah Rothman
Monday,
October 28, 2024
Donald
Trump has been pretty clear about who he was
talking about when he mused about the “enemy from within” and how “easily” they
could be “handled by, if necessary, by National Guard, or if really necessary,
by the military.”
“I
think the bigger problem are the people from within,” he said in an interview with Fox News host Maria Bartiromo, “radical
Left lunatics.” In the following days, Trump identified some of the Democratic
lawmakers he lumped into that category. “When you look at ‘Shifty Schiff’ and
some of the others, yeah, they are, to me, the enemy from within,” the former president said of
Democratic congressman (and likely future California senator) Adam Schiff. “I
think Nancy Pelosi is an enemy from within,” Trump added, blaming the former
House speaker for the violence that unfolded on January 6, 2021. He places
special counsel prosecutor Jack Smith among the ranks of the “mentally deranged” who should be “thrown out of the
country.” And so on.
Again,
it’s all rather cut and dried. But a straightforward interpretation of the
former president’s vengeful ruminations is politically inauspicious for the
Trump campaign. So, his allies and surrogates have embarked on a familiar
effort to convince the voting public that a sophisticated analysis of Trump’s
remarks must disregard what he actually said and defer to a process of
divination that culminates in a more banal interpretation.
That’s
what Republican vice-presidential nominee J. D. Vance attempted to pull off in a recent
interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper.
“He
did not say that, Jake,” Vance roared with exasperation after Tapper
characterized Trump’s remarks as wanting “to use the military to go after the
enemy within, which is the American people.”
“He
said he was going to send the military after the American people? Show me the
quote where he said that,” Vance demanded. “He said, ‘far-left lunatics,’” the
Ohio senator added. “He’s talking about the people rioting after the election.”
Vance
argued that it was necessary to parse Trump’s remarks to distinguish the
internal enemies against whom he would deploy the armed forces and those who
would be spared that heavy-handedness. “He said that he wanted to use the
military to go after far-left lunatics who were rioting. He also called them
the enemy from within,” Vance posited. “He separately — in a totally different
context, in a totally different conversation — said that Adam Schiff and Nancy
Pelosi were threats to this country.”
Just
because Trump “uses the exact same phrase” to describe these two categories of
subversive fifth columnists, Vance concluded, that does not necessarily suggest
that he would use the same tools to extirpate them from American public life.
“Donald Trump never said ‘Americans’ writ large,” Vance closed.
Not
exactly encouraging stuff. But, as spin goes, Vance turned in a serviceable
performance. And yet, his boss just won’t play along. Hours after the interview
aired, Donald Trump took to the stage at a rally in Madison Square Garden to
reaffirm that his remarks should be taken both literally and seriously.
There,
Trump
denounced the “massive, vicious, crooked, radical Left
machine that runs today’s Democrat Party.” “It’s just this amorphous group of
people. But they’re smart, and they’re vicious. And we have to defeat them. And
when I say, ‘the enemy from within,’ the other side goes crazy,” the former
president added. “They’ve done very bad things to this country. They are,
indeed, the enemy from within.”
Trump’s
defenders will take solace insofar as the former president had the presence of
mind to say that his objective is to “defeat” Democrats, presumably at the
ballot box rather than at bayonet point. But Trump made it as plain as he
possibly could that, in his mind, the forces that make up “the enemy from
within” are composed of his political opponents.
No comments:
Post a Comment