National Review Online
Monday, September 02, 2024
In the September 8, 1956, issue of National Review,
we said, “For many years, the great bullies in America have been the big,
tough, cocky labor unions; yet those who cry out against their excesses are
yawned away, dismissed as cranks, pests.” Since then, more Americans have come
to see things our way, leaving organized labor behind. But that doesn’t mean
the unions have changed.
Today is Labor Day, a day when the rest of the media
(much of it unionized) sanitize the history of organized labor, telling
feel-good stories about how unions invented the weekend or made workplaces
safe. Most advances of that sort are actually caused by higher productivity and
are observable anywhere productivity improves, no matter what the union regime
looks like. The media leave out the constant corruption and politicization that
have persuaded so many Americans that union bosses are in it for themselves,
not for the workers.
Not mentioned in labor hagiography is that arguably the
largest domestic-terrorism campaign in U.S. history was waged by a union. From
1905 to 1911, the Ironworkers union bombed more than 100 industrial sites
across the country, in a campaign that was centrally coordinated from the
union’s headquarters. No one was killed until 1910, when 21 died in its bombing
of the headquarters of the Los Angeles Times, whose owner at the time
was opposed to unions. Even after that, the bombing campaign continued, with
the Springfield, Mass., municipal building going up in a 1911 blast.
In a media environment where old institutions are often
expected to apologize for conduct others have committed a century or more
earlier, the Teamsters are never held to account for decades of embezzlement,
violence, and Mafia links that have occurred much more recently. It took 25
years of federal oversight for the Teamsters to reach the bare minimum standard
of not being integrated with organized crime, a process that was only completed
in 2015, and Teamsters officials have still been convicted of crimes since
then.
For many unions, the corruption isn’t even in the past.
The United Auto Workers today operates under the watch of a court-appointed
monitor, who is currently investigating president Shawn Fain for financial
misconduct and workplace retaliation. This summer, the IBEW Philadelphia local
had its longtime president and business manager each sentenced to federal
prison for bribery and embezzlement.
This isn’t a case of a few bad apples ruining the bunch.
Corruption is systemic to American unionism, and it has been for over 100
years. For a long time, these bullies had disproportionate economic and
political power, and that rubbed many Americans the wrong way.
They voted for Republicans who would do something about
it. When Ronald Reagan fired the striking air-traffic controllers and
decertified their union, he was castigated as a bully himself. But it is
illegal for federal employees to go on strike, a crime punishable by up to a
year in jail. By merely barring them from government employment and not
prosecuting them, Reagan was being magnanimous. The message was nonetheless
received: Reagan meant business, and unions weren’t in charge.
U.S. union membership has been declining for decades, no
matter which party is in power. For all its efforts to engineer a union
resurgence as the self-described most pro-union administration in American
history, the Biden administration has overseen record lows in the
union-membership rate. No amount of media hype can change the facts:
Private-sector unionization is at 6 percent.
That’s a big drop from the 1950s peak of about one-third.
Usually unremarked upon is that even then, when organized labor was supposedly
delivering the goods for workers, two-thirds of Americans were not members.
That was during a time when right-to-work laws were less widespread than they
are today, so many in the unionized third didn’t have much of a choice in
joining. Still today, private-sector workers in 24 states do not have the legal
guarantee that joining or financially supporting a union is voluntary.
Though the U.S. has a low unionization rate among
developed countries, the downward trend in union membership is a general
phenomenon. The union-membership rate in the OECD has declined from 38 percent
in 1960 to 16 percent today. That includes decades-long declines in countries
that pro-union Americans sometimes want to emulate, such as Germany and the
Netherlands.
Half of the union members who remain in the U.S. work for
government, a fact that would astonish the man who led the actual most
pro-union administration in American history, Franklin Roosevelt. He did
everything he could to boost private-sector unions for the benefit of his
Democratic Party, which reaped what it sowed in 1946 when Republicans won
control of Congress and passed the Taft-Hartley Act over Harry Truman’s veto
after union agitation roiled the post-war U.S. economy. But even Roosevelt knew
that collective bargaining was not fit for the public sector, where unions
since the 1960s playact negotiating with a government that can’t go out of
business led by politicians they helped elect.
This perversion is on full display in Chicago, where a
former teachers’-union organizer is mayor with the backing of the teachers’
union, but it exists in varying degrees in every government with unionized
workers. The basic problem is a constitutional one, since Article IV guarantees
to every state (and, as creatures of the states, every locality) a republican
form of government. When public-sector unions are able to collectively bargain
not only for wages and benefits but for work rules that dictate how the
government is run, they are taking power that rightfully belongs to the voters
and their elected representatives. A constitutional amendment to prohibit their
existence would be right and just.
Unions wield their political power to pursue the full
suite of progressive policy goals, from raising the minimum wage and taxes to
supporting gender ideology and Palestinian activism. It’s no wonder that in a
politically 50–50 country, most people don’t feel comfortable paying dues to a
99–1 labor movement.
No comments:
Post a Comment