By Dominic Pino
Tuesday,
January 02, 2024
The Navy
Times reports that members of the crew of the USS Carney,
a destroyer that shot down dozens of Houthi drones and missiles while on
deployment in the Red Sea, are receiving awards for their service.
“On
Tuesday, the head of U.S. 5th Fleet, Vice Adm. Brad Cooper, visited the ship
and presented ‘combat medals’ to five sailors for their ‘exceptional
performance’ when the warship shot down 14 Houthi air drones on Dec. 16,” the
story says. In addition to those medals, the entire crew received a “combat
action ribbon.” (The crew also received more than 1,000 pounds of barbecue, the
story says.)
The
awarding of the combat-action ribbon was significant, the Navy Times reports:
Officials have regularly declined to say
whether Carney and other Navy destroyers are the targets of the attack drones
they have taken out.
But the Navy’s combat action ribbon
eligibility guidance states that a sailor “must have rendered satisfactory
performance under enemy fire while actively participating in a ground or
surface combat engagement,” suggesting that the Carney was in fact intercepting
attack drones that meant to do the warship and its sailors harm.
These
are well-earned awards, and the crew of the Carney performed
exceptionally well under pressure. But the awards raise the question that Noah posed this morning: Why is the U.S. so hesitant
about striking Houthi bases in Yemen?
It’s
not only the general U.S. interest in the freedom of navigation that is under attack in the Red Sea. The awards confirm that
U.S. sailors were under attack too — and that this situation could have been
much worse had the crew of the Carney not performed as well as
it did.
No comments:
Post a Comment