By David Harsanyi
Monday, April 04, 2022
Anti-gun activist David Hogg spent the weekend tweeting
out his usual half-baked nonsense about guns. “If you need
a license to kill deer why don’t you need one to kill humans?” and “Uteruses
should not be more regulated than guns,” and other similar gems. Hogg, now
a student at Harvard, is apparently under the impression that the Second Amendment
sanctions murder and that pregnant women are subjected to background checks.
It’s nearly impossible to engage in any genuine debate with emotionalist
arguments so untethered from reality.
That didn’t stop Marjorie Taylor Greene. And, as you
might imagine, the discourse —
“try hanging out with actual deer hunters” to be “more masculine” and “learn
about how we will get our food supply when Biden’s inflation makes buying food
unaffordable,” the Georgia congresswoman argued — was not exactly elevated.
Events then unfolded as they always do when someone challenges Hogg. “Marjorie
Taylor Greene Harangues School Shooting Survivor Over Gun Stance” read
one Newsweek headline,
and CNN’s Alisyn Camerota had Hogg on her
show to demand that Greene apologize to the families of victims of gun
violence.
Many liberals seem to believe that using the opinions of
either a young person, such as Greta Thunberg, or someone who experiences
trauma, such as Cindy Sheehan, as a proxy for their pet issues demands default
admiration and exemption from any political criticism.
“Harangue,” for example, intimates that Hogg is being
singled out and harassed because of his experience at Stoneman Douglas High
School rather than his vocal position on gun ownership. I’m no MTG fan, to
say the least, but Hogg was using a public forum to smear gun-rights advocates
as terrorists and murders. Hogg has over a million followers. He’s afforded
glowing media attention because he spearheads a political movement that aligns with
the mass media’s ideological position. He’s at Harvard very likely because of
this activism. Hogg lived through a mass shooting. It gives him personal
insight into that murderous rampage and tragedy. It does not, however, imbue
him with (an even a rudimentary) understanding of history or of gun
laws. And even if it did, the rest of us would still get to disagree with
him. If Hogg doesn’t want to be “harangued” on the gun issue, he might think
about quitting activism.
No comments:
Post a Comment