By Kevin D.
Williamson
Saturday, April
23, 2022
Sometimes it seems that Elon Musk learned
the art of public relations from Tony Montana of “Scarface”:
“Make way for the bad guy.”
The billionaire troublemaker loves a
public brawl and doesn’t mind playing the villain, and at the moment he has
Twitter all atwitter at the prospect of his taking over the company — a $43 billion lark that Musk seems to have undertaken in a fit of pique at the
social-media giant’s seemingly arbitrary approach to free speech and content moderation.
With more than 80 million followers, Musk
is a very active user of Twitter — too active at times, in the view of the SEC,
which has put him under a partial gag
order as the result of ill-considered
tweets with the power to move the stock market. Musk doesn’t like the way
Twitter runs its business, so he wants to make it his business.
Twitter’s board rebuffed his
solo effort to take the company over, but Musk
didn’t give up: He’s been knocking on doors on Wall Street looking for
big-money partners such as Morgan Stanley or Apollo Global Management to back
his hostile takeover. On Thursday, he said he had secured
$46.5 billion in financing.
Twitter annoyed the wrong billionaire: A
social-media feud that is also an opportunity to make a pile of money is
precisely the sort of thing Elon Musk lives for.
Musk isn’t exactly a full-time troll: He
did manage to build a major automobile company almost from scratch, taking
Tesla from three guys with a big idea to a firm that today has a market
value 20 times that
of General Motors, jump-starting the electric-vehicle
market into existence worldwide. His SpaceX company does important work for
NASA and has added some pretty cool stuff to the rocketry repertoire, such
as landing a spacecraft vertically on a
boat at sea. He has some other projects
in the works — from hyperloops that could replace most airline travel to his nonprofit
artificial-intelligence work — and he was, at the close of business on
Friday, the wealthiest
man in the world.
Musk, who calls himself a “free-speech
absolutist,” wants to make Twitter a more free and
open platform. What has spooked many of his critics — especially those within
the company — is not that he plans to make the platform a moderation-free
digital Wild West in which Islamic State snuff movies are treated as though
they were brownie recipes but rather that he proposes to make public some aspects
of the company’s decision-making
processes and some of its algorithms, creating real transparency in the operations of what is today a
corporate black box.
This is likely to embarrass Twitter, whose
employees exploit the arbitrary and opaque character of its operations to
pursue private social and political vendettas, e.g. trying to suppress
the New York Post’s coverage of Hunter Biden’s shenanigans (which you can now read about, years after the fact, in the New York Times and the Washington Post) before the 2020 election, when they would have embarrassed Joe Biden
and possibly helped Donald Trump. I wrote the case against Trump — literally:
My book, “The Case
Against Trump,” was published in 2016 — but it is very
difficult even for me to imagine a plausible rationale for denying Donald Trump a Twitter
account while the Taliban has free access to
the platform. Twitter’s only reliable free-speech principle is that it shuns
anything that causes California progressives to run around shrieking with their
dresses over their heads.
What Musk proposes is not taking away
Twitter’s ability to regulate content on its platform but rather to disinfect
that process by dragging Twitter’s inner workings out of the shadows and into
the sunshine.
There is plenty to criticize about
Twitter, which is the vast open sewer of our public life. And there is plenty
to criticize about Elon Musk, too. I do not think that Musk is likely to make
Twitter any worse than it already is, because I do not think that is possible:
The basic architecture of Twitter — anonymity, immediacy, the way a following
is built — ensures that Twitter brings out the worst in its users. Twitter
rewards hysteria, performative outrage, and tribalism, and has very little use
for thoughtfulness, nuance, or consensus-building. A good version of Twitter
simply would not be Twitter.
Watching Elon Musk take on Twitter is like
watching a hockey game or sitting through the Oscars: The beatdown will be the
fun part, no matter who wins.
No comments:
Post a Comment