Monday, August 16, 2021

The Democratic Party Can’t Have It Both Ways on Afghanistan

By Charles C. W. Cooke

Monday, August 16, 2021

 

Mistakes tend to hurt politicians most when they play into the public’s preconceptions. A man who is regarded as intelligent but aloof will be able to say something truly dumb and get away with it, but will likely be damaged if he seems detached. A man who is considered stupid but kind can sound blunt without consequence, but may be damaged by appearing inadequate. It is reinforcement, not surprise, that remains the politician’s greatest foe.

 

Given his carefully crafted image, the biggest political risk to Joe Biden posed by the Afghanistan fiasco is that it will make him seem incompetent — or perhaps, given his peculiar absence during the crisis, truant. But his party? That’s a whole ’nother kettle of fish. The Democrats in 2021 have a reputation for being a bunch of out-of-touch scolds who believe that reality conforms to language and who tend to leverage the same tone and vocabulary when discussing agrarian warlords as they would during a Harvard symposium on intersectionality. And boy does their reaction to the fall of Kabul confirm that conceit. Last week, as its soldiers were sweeping across Afghanistan, Jen Psaki told the press that “the Taliban also has to make an assessment about what they want their role to be in the international community.” (Yeah, and I guess Charles Manson needs to decide whether he really wants to stay a member of this church.) On Saturday, Nancy Pelosi clucked that “the Taliban must know that the world is watching its actions.” (It knows: it’s live-streaming them.) It will not be too long, one suspects, before Senate majority leader Schumer gravely lowers his glasses to explain that, for some strange reason, the arc of history seems now to be bending the wrong way.

 

Those wondering why spokesmen for the Taliban end up sounding like Robin DiAngelo when talking to the Associated Press — a representative promised the outlet this weekend that his team was hoping to form an “open, inclusive Islamic government” — need look no further than to the Democratic Party for their explanation. Our enemies talk like this because our politicians talk like this. They’re beating us at our own, wildly inappropriate game.

 

And well they might, given our fatal incoherence. There was a fair case for the United States’ finally getting out of Afghanistan, albeit not in this manner. There was a fair case, too, for the United States’ electing to stay. There was no case whatsoever for indulging in this rhetorical guff while botching the hard details of a withdrawal on the ground. A realist foreign policy could plausibly require us to say, “enough is enough,” to abandon the area, and to accept the inevitable consequences. But it could never require us to abandon the area while pretending that we are handing it over to the Audubon Society. “Mommy is watching, and she’s very disappointed in you” is a tactic for keeping children in line, not seventh-century theocrats. They know we hate them. They hate us, too. And they ain’t exactly hiding it.

 

Rhetorically, Joe Biden’s party is trying to have it both ways. Leaving because it’s time to put “America First” is a coherent course — albeit not one I would have counseled. Staying while talking about the importance of universal human rights is too. But leaving while talking about the importance of universal human rights? That’s a bad joke. Nancy Pelosi said on Saturday that she was “deeply concerned about reports regarding the Taliban’s brutal treatment of all Afghans, especially women and girls,” while praising Biden for his “clarity” and “wisdom” in taking a series of actions that will lead directly to that brutal treatment. This makes no sense. As of today, it is simply not possible to say that you think the United States should leave and that you hope it will all work out. The United States is leaving, and it is not working out.

 

The British comedian Jack Dee has a good bit about the misuse of the British phrase, “Cheer up, might never happen.” “Thanks,” he says, “but I think you can tell by the knife sticking out of my arm that it did, in fact, happen.” This has happened, too; the Afghans have the stab wound to prove it. And those whose choices allowed it to happen must own the results.

No comments: