By Charles C. W. Cooke
Thursday, August 26, 2021
In the New York Times, Ezra Klein proposes that the United States’ disastrous withdrawal
from Afghanistan was not really Joe Biden’s fault — and,
moreover, that the people who disagree (which is pretty much everyone in America, it seems) are “pretending”:
In 2005, my colleagues at The
American Prospect, Sam Rosenfeld and Matt Yglesias, wrote an essay I think
about often. It was called “The
Incompetence Dodge,” and it argued that American policymakers and pundits
routinely try to rescue the reputation of bad ideas by attributing their
failure to poor execution. At the time, they were writing about the liberal
hawks who were blaming the catastrophe of the Iraq war on the Bush
administration’s maladministration rather than rethinking the enterprise in its
totality. But the same dynamic suffuses the recriminations over the Afghanistan
withdrawal.
To state the obvious: There was no
good way to lose Afghanistan to the Taliban. A better withdrawal was possible —
and our stingy, chaotic visa process was unforgivable — but so was a worse
one. Either way, there was no hope of an end to the war that didn’t reveal our
decades of folly, no matter how deeply America’s belief in its own enduring
innocence demanded one. That is the reckoning that lies beneath events that are
still unfolding, and much of the cable news conversation is a frenzied, bipartisan
effort to avoid it.
To drive home the point, Klein adds:
Focusing on the execution of the
withdrawal is giving virtually everyone who insisted we could remake
Afghanistan the opportunity to obscure their failures by pretending to believe
in the possibility of a graceful departure.
It is especially interesting to see Klein taking this
tack, given that he is typically of the view that what the United States needs
more than anything else is to put a competent technocrat into the White House.
During the early months of COVID-19, for example, Klein fantasized publicly
about how much better things would be if Elizabeth Warren were president.
“Taking [sic] to @ewarren right now,” Klein tweeted in April of last year, “is a strange, slightly
melancholy experience: like glimpsing an alternate reality where political
leadership is proportionate to the crisis we’re facing.” In that tweet, Klein
linked to a piece in which he praised Warren for being “the
first presidential candidate to release a plan for combating coronavirus” and
concluded that “Warren’s penchant for planning stands in particularly stark
contrast to this administration, which still has not released a clear
coronavirus plan.” A few days later, after Warren had dropped out of the race,
Klein tweeted dolefully, “I miss Elizabeth Warren.”
As usual, Klein has got things backwards. While “winning”
the war in Afghanistan was, indeed, a pipe dream, it would not, in fact, have
been especially hard for the United States to get out in a more orderly
fashion. The Biden administration could probably not have prevented the Taliban
from taking over again (although, if this was always inevitable, Joe Biden
shouldn’t have said exactly the opposite). But it could quite obviously have
ensured that before our troops were drawn down we had got every American,
permanent resident, and eligible Afghan out; we had removed both our weaponry
and any sensitive information; and we had consulted properly with our allies.
That part — which, to use Klein’s term, is not “the war” but “the execution of
the withdrawal” — was within Joe Biden’s control. And he completely and utterly
screwed it up. For a technocrat such as Klein to try to obfuscate this is
nothing short of astonishing.
COVID-19, by contrast, was — and is — a
far, far more difficult challenge. Frequent readers of mine will have noticed
that, with the exception of Andrew Cuomo, who engaged in a disgraceful
cover-up, I have not been especially critical of any of our leaders’ responses
to this pandemic. Why not? Well, because, outside of a handful of areas (the
development, production, and dissemination of vaccines, for example) this is
simply not an area in which one can establish easy or obvious links between the
inputs (“planning,” say) and the outputs (say, infection rates, or deaths). The
state with the highest number of COVID-19 deaths, New York, is also the
state that had the governor whom everyone praised to the hilt, while Florida,
which has a governor whom critics have rechristened “DeathSantis,” is 26th. As
I write, Texas and Hawaii are producing virtually identical per
capita infection charts, despite having adopted dramatically different policies.
Seven months into the presidency that was going to save us — and despite his
having said on July 4 of this year that “we’re closer than ever to declaring
our independence from a deadly virus” — President Joe Biden is still presiding
over a crisis. Israel, which did everything “right” from the very start, is now
seeing a brutal surge. And the rest of the world? Well, if you can
find me a coherent cause–effect pattern there, I’ll buy you an ice cream. The
idea that Elizabeth Warren could have fixed all this simply by running around
and sounding officious is absurd.
The truth is that Klein is doing here what he always
does, which is dressing up a partisan propaganda effort in pseudo-scientific
garb. What Joe Biden needs more than anything right now is for the American
people to conclude that the real issue here is not his own
stunning incompetence, but the wisdom of the war in Afghanistan per se. And so,
right on cue, Klein pops up with the goods. There’s a word for that sort of
journalist; but it’s sure as hell not “wonk.”
No comments:
Post a Comment