By Lewis Libby & Logan A. Rank
Saturday, March 21, 2020
In the winter of 2002–2003, the deadly SARS coronavirus
exploded out of China’s ‘wet-blood’ wildlife markets. SARS infected over 8,000
people worldwide and killed almost 800. Yet post-crisis, China laxly enforced
bans on the offending markets, only to permit them to flourish soon thereafter.
Today’s COVID-19 is the deadly and avoidable legacy of China’s recklessness.
U.S. secretary of state Mike Pompeo has proclaimed that
COVID-19 stems from just such Chinese ‘wet-blood’ markets. While Beijing has
praised them as protein sources, their unsanitary practices have long been
identified as “perfect viral melting pots” for zoonotic diseases — diseases
that jump from animals to man. In COVID-19’s wake, China shut down cities and
shuttered the offending Wuhan markets — for now.
Today the world strains to curtail COVID-19, mourn
losses, and salvage livelihoods. Tomorrow it must prevent a like recurrence and
account for damage done. Tomorrow’s tasks regrettably require forthrightly
identifying and addressing Beijing’s wrongful, unnecessary, and repeated
misdeeds.
As many, including Dr. Bill Karesh of the Bipartisan
Commission on Biodefense, have shown, readily affordable measures, including
refrigeration and culturally sensitive regulation, could replace China’s lax
and dangerous wet-market practices. Yet Beijing persisted, even after SARS
illustrated the international risks. That disturbing record proved a breeding
ground for COVID-19 and may recur.
Despite a vast treasury and a world-leading economy, the
Chinese Communist leadership has neglected necessary reforms, spending lavishly
instead to further hegemonic ambitions in Asia and beyond, as well as its hold
on China.
To expand her geo-political reach, China’s Belt and Road
Initiative throws money at infrastructure projects from South Asia to the North
Atlantic and from the South China Sea to Palau. National Bureau of Asian
Research currently estimates BRI to cost around $1-1.3 trillion (USD). Over the
past decades, China’s defense spending increased on average roughly 10 percent
per year, a rate vastly exceeding any competitor. For a pittance of such
expenditures, China could have avoided today’s pandemic and helped prevent
future ones.
Internally, the CCP has spent millions viciously
repressing multi-child families, Internet use, Muslim Uighurs, Hong Kong
democrats, and the Dalai Lama’s Tibet, to name a few. Food stalls would be
child’s play.
Who suffers from CCP leaders prioritizing international
hegemony and party supremacy? The world.
Sadly, after COVID-19 began to spread, China exacerbated
its wrongful conduct: first covering it up; then hindering others’ abilities to
understand, halt, and mitigate the disease; and finally blaming its victims.
In a recent interview, National Security adviser Robert
O’Brien suggested that China’s cover-up of the coronavirus outbreak delayed the
global response by two months. Chinese authorities, he noted, actively
suppressed doctors’ warnings.
Once word got out, China then barred health experts from
China, where they had hoped to study the disease and its spread.
These lost months were costly. All the while, unwitting
travelers spread the virus. Lost weeks delayed gathering medical supplies,
readying facilities, and developing countermeasures.
Having unnecessarily caused and exacerbated a worldwide
pandemic, untouchable Chinese officials added their next outrage — blaming
America. Beijing shamelessly poses as both victim and savior, seeking
disproportionate praise for sharing genome information, casualty data, and,
relative to the harm, limited supplies.
In any just and lawful setting, actors who recklessly
pursue hazardous activities would be held accountable for foreseeable harm
caused to others. It would not matter if the wrongdoers did not intend such
harm; it would be enough that they knowingly persisted. Exacerbating harm by
concealing it and retarding mitigation only increases such liability.
Prevention and simple justice require that Beijing accept
consequences facing any other wrongdoer — including an end to dangerous
practices and extending at least partial compensation to those so grievously
harmed outside China. International diplomacy, legislation, executive action or
legal proceedings here and abroad should seek to ensure Beijing acts
responsibly.
Yes, China, too, has suffered from its irresponsible
practices. Many Chinese have tragically died, and Beijing’s guided economy has
stumbled from Beijing’s misguided choices.
However, the free world groans under horrendous losses of
Beijing’s making. The unnecessary deaths will be staggering and financial
losses crippling. According to assessments by the UN and others, this outbreak
could cost the world between $1 to $2.7 trillion. As of mid-March, the U.S.
stock market has dropped almost 30 percent from its mid-February high, wiping
out nearly $3.7 trillion from the U.S. market alone. As families cower amid
Lysol wipes, businesses reel from disrupted supply chains and operations.
Recession looms, forcing states worldwide to introduce stimulus packages, with
the U.S. debating a $1 trillion plan.
Over the years, the self-appointed rulers of China have
escaped not just domestic, but international liability for their wrongdoing.
Over the years, their thefts of intellectual property, wrongful trade
practices, ruthless domestic oppression, support of rogue regimes,
proliferation of nuclear technology, and unlawful conduct in the South China
Sea have been excused or effectively ignored. Certainly, China has never
suffered setbacks commensurate with what it sought to gain.
Why do Chinese leaders think they can get away with such
wrongs? As President Trump warned Americans years ago, because they have. He
added, shame on us for letting them do so.
To his enormous credit, President Trump has said,
“Enough.” His administration has made great strides reversing the world’s
complacency toward Beijing’s misdeeds. As the president and leaders like
Senators Cotton and Rubio turn to bolstering U.S. defenses and preventing
future devastation, American and world leaders alike should find ways to ensure
that this time, China does more than temporarily close a market. Otherwise, the
next ‘wet-blood’ pandemic awaits.
No comments:
Post a Comment