By Alexandra DeSanctis
Monday, March 09, 2020
It’s not hard to understand why Elizabeth Warren will not
be the Democratic presidential nominee.
Unless, that is, you’re one of her most zealous fans, in
which case getting to the bottom of her departure from the race requires
careful scrutiny of the apparent sexism lurking beneath the crust of American
culture — a practice that her defenders have been engaged in since her campaign
began.
Never mind that, if misogyny of any kind is responsible
for Warren’s demise, it is that of Democratic primary voters, who
overwhelmingly chose the senator’s opponents, including in her home state of
Massachusetts, where she, a second-term senator, came in a distant third place.
(Bernie Sanders, by contrast, won his own home state of Vermont on the same night
with a whopping 50 percent of the vote.)
Don’t expect Warren’s progressive devotees in the media,
arguably her most passionate constituency, to consider these realities any time
soon. “America Punished Elizabeth Warren for Her Competence” was the headline
of Megan Garber’s article published in The Atlantic after Warren ended
her campaign. “The country still doesn’t know what to make of a woman — in
politics, and beyond — who refuses to qualify her success,” reads the subtitle.
Garber went on to list various criticisms Warren faced
during the campaign, including that she is “sanctimonious,” “condescending,”
and “a know-it-all.” “The accusation of condescension, however, is less about
enforced humiliation than it is about enforced humility. It cannot be disentangled
from Warren’s gender,” Garber opines, before concluding that misogyny — the
desire to “reinforce a patriarchal status quo” — explains why Warren failed.
One New York Times op-ed bore the worrisome
headline “I Am Burning with Fury and Grief over Elizabeth Warren. And I Am Not
Alone,” with a subtitle contending that Warren had “lodged herself” in “the
female psyche.” Author Sarah Smarsh opened her article with a slightly
melodramatic request: “Consider every moment, since the dawn of woman, when a
female aspired but to no avail.”
“Imagine the sadness and frustration of every such
instance as a spark, their combined energy the size of many suns,” Smarsh went
on. “That is the measure of grief and fury I felt rise inside me as I watched
Elizabeth Warren’s bid for the Democratic nomination wane.”
An article in The Nation took a similarly dismal
tone. “Sexism Sank Elizabeth Warren,” read its headline, with the subtitle “Warren
was a brilliant candidate who would have made a great president. The problem?
She’s a woman — and she isn’t ‘perfect.’” So wrote Elie Mystal, adding that
Warren’s campaign was doomed by the supposed fact that “we live in a deeply
sexist culture, and that misogyny is broadcast and reinforced through every
cultural vector available.”
Feminist pundit Jessica Valenti found herself in the
depths of despair after Warren’s poor performance on Super Tuesday. “It Will Be
Hard to Get Over What Happened to Elizabeth Warren,” ran the headline of her
story, in which she lamented that “even just supporting Warren has come with an
unbearable amount of misogynist condescension.” “Once again we’re going to
watch a race to leadership between old white men,” she added, as if someone
other than her fellow progressives had put those two old white men where they
are.
Shockingly, none of these articles grapple with that
rather inconvenient fact: It was Democrats, not hateful Republicans, who voted
in the Democratic primaries and who preferred other candidates over
Warren. It’s difficult to blame misogynistic conservative white men for
Warren’s failure when the people voting against her were Democratic women, very
liberal Democrats, college graduates, and African Americans.
Worth noting, too, is the fact that Hillary Clinton —
also a woman — won the Democratic nomination not four years ago and went on to
win the popular vote in the general election. Perhaps, then, the problem is not
with pervasive sexism but with Warren herself and the way she conducted her
campaign. Let’s consider where she might’ve gotten her reputation for
insincerity.
She falsely
claimed to have faced pregnancy discrimination and was still repeating this
untruth in the days before she dropped out. She campaigned against school
choice and charter schools while falsely
claiming that her children had not gone to private school. She refused,
several times, to say whether her Medicare for All plan would raise taxes on
the middle class — and she subsequently falsely claimed that it would not.
That’s not even considering her absurd, decades-long
fiction about being of Native American heritage, a falsehood she took every
chance to deploy by listing herself as a minority while employed at the
University of Pennsylvania and Harvard University and referring to herself as
Native American during her political campaigns. After facing a good deal of
criticism for this particular flight of fancy, Warren shot her burgeoning
campaign in the foot by informing the public via genetic-test results that she
was, in fact, 1/1,024th Cherokee.
If anything, Warren explicitly benefited throughout the
campaign from being female, using her gender to play the victim card, even when
doing so required fudging the facts or entirely reinventing them to suit her
purposes, as in the case of her disproven allegation of pregnancy
discrimination.
Perhaps the best example was when Warren spun several
news cycles out of her assertion that Bernie Sanders is a sexist, alleging that
he had once told her a woman could never be president. He strongly denied this
several times. Moderators raised the matter in a debate, only to deny him time
to respond. They treated Warren’s unproven assertion as a fact and instead
repeatedly silenced Sanders on the topic, while Warren continued to attack him
unchallenged.
The notion that Elizabeth Warren’s presidential hopes
were dashed by an American electorate not ready for a female president is pure
wishcasting, indulged in only by media elites who believed that her campaign
was destined to succeed largely because they had thrown their weight behind it.
For anyone watching the race with clear eyes, it is evident that Warren’s
biggest flaws were not her chromosomes but her inept political maneuvering and
her pattern of dishonesty.
No comments:
Post a Comment