By David Harsanyi
Thursday, March 26, 2020
Here are some of the public figures and institutions that
Americans hold in higher esteem than the media according
to Gallup:
Hospitals
Their child’s school and daycare centers
State governments
Their employer
CDC and NIH
Mike Pence
Donald Trump
Congress
Only one institution that Gallup asked about, the media,
had negative approval rating — sitting 19 points behind its archenemy Donald
Trump. And there are likely many other people and places that the public has
more trust in than journalists.
This reality is a disaster for a liberal democracy, and
much of it is brought on by the press’s own blinkered, sanctimonious, and
transparently partisan temperament. On this topic, I could provide a
book-length list of grievances. Every day brings an exasperating number of
misleading and bad-faith takes by political journalists and “fact-checkers.”
But for now, I’ll just note that it’s not merely a
problem of traditional bias among reporters and cable news networks, which
preach exclusively to their choirs (no one is innocent on that count.) I’ve
long read major newspapers, whose nonpolitical product is often amazing,
through a filter. The institutional bias at the Washington Post and the New
York Times certainly isn’t new. But there used to be a corresponding level
of professional gravitas that engendered reader trust.
Some of that trust has been corroded over years of Obama
adulation, echo chambers, conspiracy mongering, and knee-jerk partisanship.
Some of that trust has also been corroded by the litany of Trump-slaying
“bombshells” that have fizzled over the past years. I don’t know how many times
I’ve recently heard people affix “if it turns out to be true” to a breaking
news story.
Sorry, it’s difficult to trust a newspaper that allows
its headline writing to be controlled by left-wing Twitter mobs or one that
sends a senior editor from the Washington Post to write a piece on some
Twitter rando with 400 followers to own Trump — and then track down his poor
parents for good measure. How do we trust producers who believe Dan Rather — a
man who pushed multiple forged documents, which smeared Bush 43, on the
American public — is the perfect guest
to lecture
Americans about accuracy?
All three of those things happened this week.
Worse than all that — or maybe it’s for the best —
everyone can now see the hive mind of political journalism at work on Twitter.
For years, media organizations have whined about the lack
of White House press briefings, which were mostly childish spectacles that
pitted pompous media personalities against disingenuous government
personalities.
Once the coronavirus crisis hit, the White House began
daily press briefings with the president and his task force. These have
featured Trump’s usual braggadocio and exaggerations, but they have also been
quite informative — especially when Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Deborah Birx have
spoken. The briefings bring in big ratings.
From the start, the ostensibly serious press often focused
on frivolous gotchas rather than pertinent questions — why is the president
calling a virus unleashed by the Chinese communists a “Chinese virus?” and so
on. At yesterday’s White House briefing, a reporter — I couldn’t track down the
name or publication of the journalist, but he had all the pretensions of
serious reporter — asked the president of the United States, “How many deaths are
acceptable?”
This stupid query might have seemed strange to anyone who
didn’t exists in Twitter’s zeitgeist, where mainstream journalism’s agenda is
dictated by left-wing punditry. But the question was a manifestation of a
talking point pushed by leftist pundits: Their hot take is that Trump wants to
sacrifice your grandparents to pump up the Dow.
Trump — who had never once told anyone to stop social
distancing or ordered people to go back to work (as if he even could) —
mentioned his perhaps unrealistic hope of the economy beginning to open by
Easter. A legitimate question regarding societal balance, one inherent in nearly
every debate over public policy, was quickly reduced to a childish false
choice.
Here is how CNN covers it now:
In any event, the media’s inane and badgering questions
may well have helped Trump’s poll numbers. As soon as the media organizations
saw that public wasn’t reacting in the way they had hoped, stations such as NBC
and CNN began debating whether they should cover the pandemic press briefings
at all. This is, of course, their prerogative. It also is the latest example of
why so many Americans don’t trust them.
The media’s ineptitude and malfeasance — merely damaging
and divisive during an impeachment hearing or a Supreme Court nomination fight
— are dangerous during a pandemic.
No comments:
Post a Comment