National Review Online
Monday, March 25, 2019
Our long national hysteria may not be over, but at least
it should — by rights — be diminished.
Robert Mueller delivered his long-awaited report on
Friday, and Attorney General William Barr just released his summary of the
findings. They completely vindicate President Trump regarding the allegation
that his campaign colluded with the Russians during the 2016 election, and also
conclude that he didn’t commit the crime of obstruction of justice.
The Russia finding couldn’t be starker. In his letter
Barr quotes directly from the report:
“[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump
Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election
interference activities.” This, according to Barr, after more than 2,800
subpoenas, 500 search warrants, 230 orders for communication records, 50 orders
authorizing use of pen registers, and interviews with roughly 500 witnesses. If
there were any evidence of collusion, Mueller would have found it.
It always seemed unlikely, if not outright preposterous,
that the Russians would have entrusted a sensitive intelligence operation to
the most shambolic general-election campaign in modern memory. There was no
reason to collude with the Trump campaign, in any case — the Russians obviously
hacked Democrats’ emails, on their own, and then released them via their
WikiLeaks cutout, on their own. Nonetheless, even as Mueller indictments and
plea deals piled up, with no suggestion of collusion in sight, Trump critics
could never give up on the idea.
The media was obsessed, and always implied there was some
devastating revelation just over the horizon. MSNBC and CNN took every minor
scooplet from outlets such as the Washington
Post and the Daily Beast and blew
them up into major stories. The press, in its zeal to believe the worst,
sometimes published too-good-to-check erroneous reports. Otherwise serious
opinion writers accused Trump of being a traitor or perhaps a Russian asset
since 1987. John Brennan assured everyone that there was no doubt that there
was collusion. Democrats such as Adam Schiff said the same.
It’d be a nice contribution to the public discourse if
any of these people admitted they were wrong, but instead they will all move
on, looking for the next blockbuster to destroy Trump looming somewhere over
the next hill.
As for obstruction, that’s come a cropper, too, although
the Barr letter is careful to note that Mueller doesn’t exonerate Trump on this
score. Clearly, Trump hated the probe and, if he’d had his own way, would have
ended it. He never did, though. Since Trump wasn’t guilty of collusion, it’s
hard to see what his corrupt motive would have been justifying an obstruction
charge — indeed, the chief cause of his rage seems to have been that he was
indeed, as he insisted all along, innocent of collusion, yet subjected to
years-long investigation. Also, it’s dubious that a president can obstruct
justice while exercising his lawful powers. So Mueller left the legal question
to Barr, who concluded there wasn’t evidence of a crime.
Democrats are now clamoring for the full Mueller report,
hoping it reveals something more damaging than what is alluded to in the Barr
letter. Although we are sure there are embarrassing details, Barr notes that
most of the episodes related to obstruction are already known. Still, we favor
maximum disclosure, mindful of the restrictions on disclosing grand-jury
material — as well as disclosure of as many materials as possible related to
how this investigative train got running in the first place.
We said at the outset of the Mueller probe that we
preferred an independent commission as the more appropriate venue for a public
airing of the facts around Russian interference. Mueller ended up proceeding in
the same rut as most special-counsel probes, prosecuting a lot of process
crimes and a few more-serious offenses not directly related to the matter at
hand. There was plenty to work with here, since Trump’s associates, from Paul Manafort
to Roger Stone, were such a motley, sleazy crew. They are marks against his
judgment; that never made Trump a traitor.
If nothing else, Mueller will have accomplished something
important if he’s managed to put that poisonous charge to bed.
No comments:
Post a Comment