By Kevin D. Williamson
Sunday, March 03, 2019
There was a time, not that long ago, when Democrats used
to decry “voting in lockstep.”
That was a big talking point during the George W. Bush
years, with a couple of unspoken qualifiers: “Voting in lockstep” was bad when
Republicans did it, and very, very bad when Republicans did it while in the
majority. That line of rhetoric lasted for a few months, until somebody did
some actual reporting and found that the data demonstrated the opposite: In
spite of all their humble-bragging about being more diverse and less
disciplined than Republicans, Democrats in Congress in fact voted with their
leadership more often than Republicans did at the time.
There were some pretty obvious reasons for that: Ron Paul
and other libertarian-leaning Republicans often opposed the Bush
administration, fiscal hawks voted from time to time against go-along/get-along
spending bills, etc. That continued into the Obama years as more ideologically
rigid Republicans from safe districts increasingly bucked at the leadership of
more moderate Republicans such as Speaker of the House John Boehner. As Ryan
Lizza put it in the New Yorker in
2013: “Boehner has lost his ability to control his caucus.”
There has been a general trend toward more en bloc congressional voting for
decades, and the parties have become more ideologically uniform: Republicans
still have a number of important ideological cleavages as the culture warriors
work to gut the Chamber of Commerce crowd, and the Democrats have been showing
some cleavage lately, too, as the socialists grow annoyed with the Democrats
who are dumb enough to call themselves socialists in public. But how many real
wild cards are there? Not many: Justin Amash on the Republican side, maybe Joe
Manchin on the Democratic side. The Free-Thinking Caucus is not exactly a
growth enterprise.
But after all those years of complaining about
Republicans “marching in lockstep,” the Democrats have a new program: marching
in lockstep.
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi is embarrassed, to the
extent that she is capable of being embarrassed, by the fact that Republicans
pulled a humorous little switcheroo on her. House Democrats were on the verge
of passing a bill that would require you to get clearance from the federal
government before selling your old deer rifle to your brother-in-law for 50
bucks, and Republicans got a couple dozen Democrats to join them in support of
a last-minute amendment that would have required alerting immigration
authorities when those mandatory background checks turned up illegal
immigrants, who are not permitted to buy firearms.
Keep in mind that this was a symbolic flip of the bird to
a piece of legislation that itself is a symbolic flip of the bird: Senator
Mitch McConnell isn’t going to be letting any Democratic gun-grabbing
legislation come to a vote in the Senate. So it’s symbolism about symbolism
about symbolism, but Madame Speaker flipped her wig, anyway. She called those
moderate Democrats, many of whom represent districts carried by Donald Trump,
in to a meeting to berate them. Never mind the quality of the legislation, this
is about party discipline: “Vote no, just vote no, because the fact is a vote
yes is to give leverage to the other side.”
Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, for her part, is
a self-proclaimed socialist who apparently is ready to move straight into the
Stalinist phase of her political career, promising to organize purges against
Democrats who don’t do as she says. She’s even calling herself a “boss” these
days. No doubt she’s already looking for her Trotsky.
Writing in Jacobin,
a socialist magazine (100 million dead in the 20th century, but socialism never
loses its appeal to the worst), James Muldoon of the University of Exeter works
to revive the thinking of the Marxist theoretician Karl Kautsky, particularly
the idea that “democracy must extend beyond the state level itself.” To extend
the reach of “democracy” beyond the public sector and into the private sector
amounts to the abolition of private life entirely, putting formerly private
affairs (by no means limited to economic organization) under political
discipline. That is something close to a working textbook definition of totalitarianism.
The purges that Representative Ocasio-Cortez envisions
for the Democratic party already are a part of ordinary life thanks to the
efforts of progressives. If it should happen that you have a child who was once
photographed standing in proximity to another child who had a look on his face
that someone with political power disapproved of, there will be an organized
effort to have you deprived of employment and ruined economically and otherwise
by whatever means are available, as happened in the Covington affair. The rule
of absolute conformity is by no means limited to elected members of the
Democratic party answerable to partisan leadership: “Democracy,” as they like
to call it (it is more ochlocracy),
is to be extended into every aspect of life. That is the vision of the Left in
2019: Mob rule under a dollop of ideological frosting.
That a liberal political culture cannot survive enforced
homogeneity is obvious enough. The assault on free speech already is well under
way, and the Democrats are poised to impose sweeping restrictions on political
communication and organizing as soon as they have the votes.
“The personal is the political,” they used to say. The
slogan is intellectually flaccid but no less authoritarian and totalitarian for
that. Progressives, once the partisans of “diversity,” “tolerance,” and social
liberalism, have become the partisans of absolutism, conformism, and moral
hysteria. Part of that is cynical politics: It was predictable that the same
people who championed toleration when they were a relatively powerless minority
would discover the attractions of homogeneity as soon as they got a taste of
political power. But there is more to this than cheap opportunism: The emerging
left-wing fanaticism gives every appearance of being mostly genuine. Genuinely
asinine, genuinely dangerous, but genuine.
Poor dopey gawping old Joe Biden apparently thinks he’s
going to get out in front of that parade, and that the red banners will be
furled on his say-so. He is in for a shock. So are the rest of us. “Voting in
lockstep” isn’t going to be enough for these new totalitarians. What they have
in mind is living in lockstep.
No comments:
Post a Comment