By Victor Davis Hanson
Thursday, September 15, 2016
On his recent Asian tour, President Obama characterized
his fellow Americans (the most productive workers in the world) as “lazy.”
In fact, he went on to deride Americans for a list of
supposed transgressions ranging from the Vietnam War to environmental
desecration to the 19th century treatment of Native Americans.
“If you’re in the United States,” the president said,
“sometimes you can feel lazy and think we’re so big we don’t have to really
know anything about other people.”
The attack on supposedly insular Americans was somewhat
bizarre, given that Obama himself knows no foreign languages. He often seems
confused about even basic world geography. (His birthplace of Hawaii is not
“Asia,” Austrians do not speak “Austrian,” and the Falkland Islands are not the
Maldives).
Obama’s sense of history is equally weak. Contrary to his
past remarks, the Islamic world did not spark either the Western Renaissance or
the Enlightenment. Cordoba was not, as he once suggested, an Islamic center of
“tolerance” during the Spanish Inquisition; in fact, its Muslim population had
been expelled during the early Reconquista over two centuries earlier.
In another eerie ditto of his infamous 2008 attack on the
supposedly intolerant Pennsylvania “clingers,” Obama returned to his theme that
ignorant Americans “typically” become xenophobic and racist: “Typically, when
people feel stressed, they turn on others who don’t look like them.”
(“Typically” is not a good Obama word to use in the context of racial
relations, since he once dubbed his own grandmother a “typical white person.”)
Too often Obama has gratuitously aroused racial
animosities with inflammatory rhetoric such as “punish our enemies,” or
injected himself into the middle of hot-button controversies like the Trayvon
Martin case, the Henry Louis Gates melodrama, and the “hands up, don’t shoot”
Ferguson mayhem.
Most recently, Obama seemed to praise backup 49ers
quarterback and multimillionaire Colin Kaepernick for his refusal to stand
during the National Anthem, empathizing with Kaepernick’s claims of endemic
American racism.
What is going on in Obama’s home stretch?
Apparently Obama is veering even further to the left, in
hopes of establishing a rhetorical progressive legacy in lieu of any lasting
legislative or foreign-policy achievement. Turning the presidency into an edgy
soapbox is seemingly all that is left of Obama’s promise to “fundamentally
transform” the country.
But divisive sermonizing and the issuing of executive orders
are not the same as successfully reforming our health-care system. The
Affordable Care Act, born of exaggeration and untruth, is now in peril as
insurers pull out and the costs of premiums and deductibles soar.
Even presidential nominee and former Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton is not really defending the Obama administration’s past “red
line” in Syria, the “reset” with Vladimir Putin’s Russia, the bombing of Libya,
the Benghazi tragedy, the euphemistic rebranding of Islamic terrorism as mere
“violent extremism,” the abrupt pullout from (and subsequent collapse of) Iraq,
or the Iran nuclear deal that so far seems to have made the theocracy both rich
and emboldened.
The U.S. economy — with its record-low growth over eight
years, near-record labor non-participation rates, record national debt, and
record consecutive years of zero interest rates — is not much of a legacy
either.
Racial relations in this country seem as bad as they have
been in a half-century.
Given the scandal involving Hillary Clinton’s use of a
private, unsecured e-mail server for official State Department communications,
the politicization of the IRS, the messes at the GSA and VA, and the current
ethical confusion at the FBI and Justice Department over Clinton’s violations,
Obama has not made good on his promise of a transparent, efficient, and honest
government.
Near energy independence through fracking is certainly a
revolutionary development, but it arrived largely despite, not because of, the
Obama administration.
The sharper the sermon, the more Obama preps himself for
his post-presidency as a social justice warrior, akin to the pre-political
incarnation of Obama as a community organizer.
Following the Clinton model, a post-presidential Obama
will no doubt garner huge fees as a “citizen of the world” — squaring the
circle of becoming fabulously rich while offering sharp criticism of the
cultural landscape of the capitalist West on everything from sports
controversies to pending criminal trials.
What, then, is the presidential legacy of Barack Obama?
It will not be found in either foreign- or
domestic-policy accomplishment. More likely, he will be viewed as an outspoken
progressive who left office loudly in the same manner that he entered it — as a
critic of the culture and country in which he has thrived.
But there may be another, unspoken legacy of Obama, and
it is his creation of the candidacy of Donald J. Trump.
Trump is running as an angry populist, fueled by the
promise that whatever supposed elites such as Obama have done to the country,
he will largely undo.
Obama’s only legacy seems to be that “hope and change”
begat “make America great again.”
No comments:
Post a Comment