By Evan Moore
Monday, July 25, 2016
Last week’s Republican Nation Convention in Cleveland was
supposed to unify the party and signal to general-election voters that Donald
Trump was capable of handling the duties of the presidency. However, his
remarks in a wide-ranging interview with the New York Times last week undermined those efforts and added to the
concerns many national security-minded voters have with his candidacy.
For the past 70 years, U.S. presidents have recognized
that defending our national interests requires using America’s overwhelming
economic and military power to support like-minded allies. This vision of a
U.S.-led global-security order, perhaps best embodied by the NATO alliance, has
not only prevented major state conflict since World War II, but has also
supported a global system of trade that has led to unparalleled prosperity for
all. In his interview with the Times,
however, Trump dismissed the value of America’s global leadership: “We are not
the same country and the world is not the same world . . . . We don’t have the
luxury of doing what we used to do; we don’t have the luxury, and it is a
luxury.” Trump should recognize that America’s international system of
alliances is not a “luxury,” it is the prerequisite of peace.
Trump’s remarks became even more alarming when he said
that, as president, he would condition defending our NATO allies on whether
they have met the organization’s target of devoting 2 percent of GDP to defense
spending. David Sanger of the Times
asked, “Can the members of NATO, including the new members in the Baltics,
count on the United States to come to their military aid if they were attacked
by Russia? And count on us fulfilling our obligation?” In response, Trump
replied “Have they fulfilled their obligations to us? If they fulfill their
obligations to us, the answer is yes.”
Trump’s threat was crouched in a familiar refrain in
which he described America’s global alliances as if they were mafia protection
rackets. He warned that if the United States is not “properly reimbursed” by
our allies, he would gladly tell them, “Congratulations, you will be defending
yourself.” He emphasized that he would “always be prepared to walk” away from our
commitments, and that he could always redeploy our military from a fortress
America that is bereft of its security partners.
Trump’s comments betray his deep ignorance of Russia’s
aggression against the West. As retired Air Force General Philip Breedlove,
former head of U.S. European Command, notes, “Moscow is determined to
reestablish what it considers its rightful sphere of influence, undermine NATO,
and reclaim its great-power status.” Furthermore, he says, “the foundation of
any strategy in Europe must be the recognition that Russia poses an enduring
existential threat to the United States, its allies, and the international
order.”
If the United States were to withdraw the remainder of
its forces from Europe or refuse to support a NATO member under attack as Trump
proposes, then the alliance would likely end because its collective-security
guarantee would be revealed to be worthless. Article 5 of the alliance’s
founding treaty is clear: An attack against one member shall be regarded as an
attack against all of them. Donald Trump should heed what British Defense
Secretary Michael Fallon said Thursday: “Article 5 is an absolute commitment.
It doesn’t come with conditions or caveats.”
It is even more important to note that the Baltic nations
have, in fact, fulfilled their obligations to the United States. Despite their
small size and limited military power, these countries were part of the
U.S.-led coalitions in Afghanistan and Iraq, devoting hundreds of troops to
each theater throughout the course of these missions. Estonia, Latvia, and
Lithuania still maintain a presence in Afghanistan today, after the end of the
coalition’s combat mission at the end of 2014. Donald Trump should be celebrating
the Baltic states’ brave determination to stand with the United States — even
when they were under no obligation to do so — instead of flippantly dismissing
it.
It is difficult to understate just how dangerous Mr.
Trump’s remarks are. The Republican nominee for president of the United States
has signaled to Vladimir Putin and other aggressors throughout the world that
the United States would not come to the defense of a treaty ally. It was
precisely this sort of uncertain signal that encouraged North Korea to invade
the South in 1950, and Saddam Hussein to invade Kuwait in 1990.
Trump’s remarks also perpetuate the falsehood that
America’s allies are “free riders” on America’s security guarantee when they
are, in fact, increasing their defense spending in response to Russia’s
aggression. As NATO reported in its communique from this month’s Warsaw Summit,
“Collectively, Allies’ defense expenditures have increased in 2016 for the
first time since 2009. In just two years, a majority of Allies have halted or
reversed declines in defense spending in real terms.”
The larger point to be made here is that NATO is simply
not a burden on the United States. Rather, as Retired Marine General Jim Jones
and former Under Secretary of State Nicholas Burns note in a recent report for
the Atlantic Council, NATO is “a force multiplier for U.S. power and influence
around the world.” They add, “America’s global network of alliances is one of
our greatest strategic assets and advantages over nations such as Russia or
China. The contributions of U.S. allies to regional and global security and
prosperity mean significant cost savings for the United States.”
It would easy to dismiss this episode as an off-hand
remark or a matter of simple ignorance. Unfortunately, however, this is what
Donald Trump actually believes. He has made similar statements before in this
campaign, and he will continue to do so until Election Day. Indeed, the
campaign’s chief policy official doubled down Thursday on both the candidate’s
remarks in his interview with the Times
as well as the successful effort to strip language from the GOP platform that
called for providing lethal military assistance to Ukraine.
Americans should recognize the enormous danger that
Donald Trump’s policies pose to global security. Our allies in Europe and
Canada are the first places where the United States looks to for help when
military action abroad is necessary. Time after time, they have risen to the
occasion and given America their vital support when it is necessary to confront
aggression and keep the peace. But, by denigrating the contributions that
America’s allies have made to our own defense, and stating that the United
States would not come to their defense in return, Donald Trump has only
emboldened our adversaries, and undermined our own security.
No comments:
Post a Comment