By Kevin D. Williamson
Monday, July 25, 2016
Accountability is for peons. Barack Obama can lie about
health care or Benghazi, Hillary Rodham Clinton can intentionally mishandle
top-secret information in a way that potentially exposes U.S. intelligence
assets, Lois Lerner can weaponize the IRS at the behest of Democratic grandees
in the Senate — and nothing happens.
If you think Debbie Wasserman Schultz has finally
received her long-awaited and well-deserved comeuppance, you’ve got another
thing coming.
Wasserman Schultz, the political stinkbomb from Florida
who is a serious contender for dumbest person in American politics (in a world
in which Donald Trump exists) was
point person for a Democratic National Committee effort to use the machinery of
the party — which is supposed to, in theory, treat candidates equally — to
undermine the presidential campaign of Senator Bernie Sanders (S., Further) in
favor of Herself.
The DNC pulled some pretty ugly stuff in the service of
burying the honking pinko from Brooklyn, including scheming to use his
religious views against him. Sanders, a son of Jewish refugees from Poland, is
a pretty secular fellow, and they figured that gap-toothed Democratic primary
voters who couldn’t be counted on to hate him for being Jewish might hate him
for being an atheist: Damned if you Jew and damned if you don’t, the Democrats’
theory goes.
Nobody is coming out of this looking good. The e-mails
contain tales of “planting stories,” and Politico
reporter Kenneth Vogel apparently entered into an agreement with the DNC to
permit them to review an article of his prior to publication, a journalistic
no-no of the first order. The article’s subject? Political corruption.
Ho, ho!
Wasserman Schultz is very bright, in the sense that the
very bottom of Carlsbad Caverns is bright, and very sharp, in the sense that a
brass doorknob or a stick of warm butter is sharp. Her greatest hits are the
stuff of legend: Chris Matthews asked her to explain the difference between
being a Democrat and a socialist (such as Bernie Sanders) and she was lost as
last year’s Easter eggs. She has suggested that Republicans want to deport all
women from the United States. She tried to use House rules to keep members of
Congress from calling Obamacare “Obamacare.” Like Joe Biden, she literally does
not know what “literally” means. She complains that if Republicans who opposed
the GM bailout had their way “we would be driving foreign cars.” Her Infiniti
SUV was made in Tochigi, Japan. (Nissan is not a suburb of Detroit.) Etc.,
etc., etc.
Misusing the DNC is not exactly the same as misusing a
government agency, inasmuch as the DNC is a private entity that can operate
under any laws it chooses. But its actions here — pretending to be neutral for
the benefit of donors and patrons while acting in effect as an arm of the Clinton
campaign — is nonetheless an act of political corruption. It may have been
illegal, too, especially if there was coordination with the Clinton campaign,
as seems likely. (Mrs. Clinton disclaims any knowledge of DNC shenanigans; she
also says that her covert toilet e-mail server was there to handle yoga
appointments.) But Wasserman Schultz’s actions were corruption even if they
weren’t illegal. Like Lois Lerner at the IRS, she was entrusted with certain
powers and misused them to benefit her political patrons.
And her new employer: Not more than a few hours after she
announced her intention to resign as chairman of the DNC, Wasserman Schultz had
a new gig: with the Clinton campaign, as an honorary chairman. Nobody ever
really gets fired in Washington — they just make lateral moves. Politics is one
of the few professions where you can get fired without taking a pay cut.
If the Democrats were serious about reform — and of
course they are not — this would not stop with a symbolic resignation by
Wasserman Schultz. There are dozens and dozens of DNC staffers who need to be
shown the door. And, given the nature of her offense — an act of political
corruption — it is beyond unseemly that Wasserman Schultz remains in her day
job, as a member of the United States House of Representatives representing a
particularly backward and hideous stretch of Floridian suburbia where the
voters apparently have a very large deficit in their self-respect accounts. She
has disgraced herself and her party, and corrupted her party’s institutions.
There will be years’ worth of litigation, and no amount of honking from Bernie
Sanders is going to stop that. If Donald Trump should win in November,
Wasserman Schultz will deserve a share of the credit.
She should resign her House seat.
If she refuses to, the Democratic party should help her
come to the right decision, if only out of self-interest. But if that fails —
and it will — then it will be up to the voters of her district to decide
whether using the allegedly neutral party apparatus to engage in Jew-baiting
for Clinton is what they want in a representative. That Wasserman Schultz is
Jewish herself doesn’t make any of that any less gross. Democrats, Floridians,
Sandersnistas, and people who care about fair play in politics all should
demand a measure of real accountability in this case.
No, this is not a conservative concern-trolling the
Democratic party. It’s true that I do not want to see the Democratic party
succeed, but if this cycle shows us anything, it’s that the only thing worse
than a duopoly of two ruthless and powerful political parties is a duopoly of
two feckless and weakened political parties. If you do not think that good
parties are part of having healthy democratic institutions, the world is eager
to see your alternative.
A word of warning to Republicans: You guys probably don’t
update your e-mail passwords as often as you should. Some of you dusty old
farts probably are still on AOL. Don’t get cocky.
No comments:
Post a Comment