By David Harsanyi
Tuesday, July 26, 2016
Let’s concede that the media’s distress about Donald
Trump’s nomination is well founded. I certainly believe so.
If so, surely it’s also fair to point out that Bernie
Sanders is by any measure an authoritarian as well. In many ways, Sanders’
proposed state intrusions into the lives of citizens are more significant,
enduring, intrusive, and revolutionary than Trump’s. These positions, by the
way, were not so long ago considered completely outside the norms of mainstream
political discourse.
Somehow it seems to escape the attention of most of those
covering the race that Bernie is a champion of an economic system that has
caused more suffering and destitution than any other in modern history. It is
almost impossible for nations to kick. Yet Sanders has, at various times,
proposed state control over whole — or large parts of — the energy, health
care, transportation, and education sectors because, well, he’s a socialist.
(Yes, democratic socialists tend to
attain power through “democratic” means in countries where democratic systems
are in place.)
I’m old enough (and I say this seriously) to recall a
time when it was considered contemptible to suggest that liberals were in any
way sympathetic to the cause of collectivism. Even now, Twitter has a
RedScareBot that will mock you as some kind of paranoid McCarthyite for
bringing up “socialism.” Yet on Monday, Americans were subjected to the
economic illiteracy of three of the most extreme anti-capitalist politicians —
Keith Ellison, Elizabeth Warren, and Sanders — ever to appear on stage at a
major party’s convention.
Up and down the roster, Democrats stroked Bernie’s ego.
They praised him for his wonderful idealism. They bragged about the movement of
confused young dreamers he has built, some of whom were shedding tears in the
crowd.
Sanders supporters offer some legitimate ethical and
policy concerns about Hillary Clinton, but you will rarely hear any criticism
of his aims from her supporters. She is a progressive who gets things done,
which is to say, he is a progressive who aims a little too high. On some
positions, however, Clinton is happy to acquiesce. Sanders and Trump have
nearly indistinguishable positions on trade, both of them pushing the party to
its fringes. Hillary now opposes Trans-Pacific Partnership, a position to the
left of Barack Obama.
And Bernie and Hillary now support a policy that would
guarantee children of any family with an annual income of $125,000 or less to go to a public college or university tuition
“free.” I guess, because public schools
have done such a swell job educating young Americans, they might actually
believe the state can provide them with free things.
“Together, my friends, we have begun a political
revolution to transform America …” Sanders tells us. Oh, he mentioned the word
“revolution” seven times in his speech, but not once the words “freedom,”
“liberty,” or “Constitution.” In Bernieland, the Supreme Court’s main function
is to overturn the First Amendment so the state can
ban books and movies critical of the Democratic Party nominees. It would
also be useful in overriding religious freedom and empowering the president to
change the immigration status of millions unilaterally:
Hillary Clinton will nominate
justices to the Supreme Court who are prepared to overturn Citizens United and end the movement toward oligarchy in this
country. Her Supreme Court appointments will also defend a woman’s right to
choose, workers’ rights, the rights of the LGBT community, the needs of
minorities and immigrants and the government’s ability to protect the
environment.
Let’s not forget that on top of all this, very much like
Trump, Sanders is a conspiracy theorist, a scaremongerer, and an anti-science
loon. Not to mention, he’s so dark and gloomy!
You’ll remember, that just last week everyone in the
media was pointing out how dark and paranoid the Republican convention was,
particularly Trump’s acceptance speech. I thought America was already great? I
guess if that were true, we wouldn’t need a revolution now, would we?
Well, Bernie seems to believe that life around here is
ugly, unjust, and unfair. In his zero-sum dystopia, oligarchs can steal your
future and your vote, and oilmen can cause cataclysmic weather events and make
an education unattainable — never mind that more kids are going to college than
ever before. The system is rigged, and the banks charge you interest! And
democracy is stolen by, among others, the “Koch Brothers” — who have actually
sat out this cycle, but whatever.
Perhaps the best thing that can be said about Democrats
is that they were sure to stop any chance of their own wild-eyed radical from
winning. For now. Trump’s supporters might be older, but let’s not forget that
both bases are as white as the wind-driven snows of Vermont.
Yet unsurprisingly, one of these politician is treated
like a gentle, good-hearted grandpa with a bit of whacky, unpredictable streak.
The other is HITLER!
No comments:
Post a Comment