By Kevin D. Williamson
Friday, July 1, 2016
Two things: First, it is impossible for a mentally and
emotionally normal adult to support Donald Trump’s bid for the presidency
without calling into question his judgment or his honor. Second, it is easier
to forgive defective judgment than deficient honor.
Trump is out whining like the spoiled little princess he
is and always has been that his fellow Republican presidential contenders,
having been vanquished, are not making good on their promise to support the GOP
nominee, presumably himself. Trump is of course absolutely correct that Marco
Rubio, Ted Cruz, et al. did make that promise, and that to withhold their
support now would constitute violating a solemn promise made in public to their
supporters.
Breaking that promise is absolutely the right thing to
do.
We allow for a certain amount of cynical calculation in
politicians — politics ain’t beanbag, as Dooley says. It may be that Senator
Cruz and Governor Kasich made that primary-debate promise to support the
eventual nominee in the hope — in the idiotic, forlorn hope — that the
Republican primary electorate would not be so backward and malevolent as to
choose an imbecilic game-show host to the left of Hillary Rodham Clinton on
most of the relevant issues of our time over a slew of solid and impressive if
imperfect conservatives. I can see Ted Cruz reenacting the final scene of Planet of the Apes: “You maniacs! You
did it!” Of course he didn’t think that Sean Hannity’s tangerine dream would
become America’s Creamsicle nightmare, but here we are.
It would be perfectly defensible — and honorable — for
Ted Cruz to say: “I made that promise thinking that the chances were remote
that Donald Trump would become the nominee, and without fully appreciating what
manner of man he was, which really began to dawn on me around the time he
suggested my father was somehow mixed up in the assassination of President John
F. Kennedy and putting out explicitly racist theories about how Mexican-American
judges can’t fairly preside over cases involving fraud allegations against
Trump. I shouldn’t have made that promise, and I regret having done so, but
there is no way in hell that I am supporting Trump. I care too much about the
future of my country and my immortal soul to climb into that particular
snake-pit just to avoid the appearance of having made a mistake in judgment,
which I clearly did.”
Of course, Senator Cruz et al. should have known well
before the grassy-knoll and eek-a-Mexican-judge stuff that Donald Trump is
unfit for the office of the presidency. And that is what he is: morally,
intellectually, and politically unfit for office. Is Hillary Rodham Clinton
actually Satan in the flesh? Of course Hillary Rodham Clinton is actually Satan
in the flesh; Donald Trump is still unfit for office. It isn’t Ted Cruz’s
fault, or John Kasich’s, or Marco Rubio’s, or Jeb Bush’s, that the American
public in free and fair elections chose two major-party candidates whose
preening self-regard, dishonesty, moral cowardice, and incompetence is in each
candidate’s case the best and only argument for the other candidate.
Well done, America.
Cruz and the rest should not be bullied into accepting
the nonsense that refusing to go in for Trump is a vote for Mrs. Clinton. It
isn’t. Declining to support Trump is an act of integrity and good taste. It
isn’t anything Cruz or Bush has done that makes Trump unsupportable — that is
Trump’s doing, and no one else’s.
If there is a revolt in Cleveland — as there should be —
it will be entirely understandable, and justifiable. If the delegates end up
playing fast and loose with the nomination rules, it may be that the Republican
party needs some new ones — the Democratic party and its undemocratic
“superdelegate” system sure is looking smart right about now: They didn’t need
McGovern to tell them twice.
Trump will demand public displays of fealty, and so will
his partisans on talk radio and cable news and elsewhere. There will be a whole
coyote pack’s worth of barking at the moon if the holdouts hold out, but they
should. A great many people have taken a step back from the Republican party
this year, and in recent years, and I can tell you that at least one of them
isn’t going to come back if the GOP decides that Trumpism is what it stands
for. I don’t think I’m the only one. I spent yesterday evening with a group of
young Republicans in Texas — Texas, friends — who are committed activists,
donors, door-knockers, future office-seekers, etc., who are suddenly not sure
that they belong in the party where they have spent their entire political
lives. I don’t think there’s much keeping them on Team Pachyderm except the
lack of a viable option. If the Libertarian party had put up a Weld-Johnson
ticket instead of the other way around, some of them surely would have bolted.
Some of them will, anyway.
The Republicans who promised to support the nominee no
matter who made an error in judgment. That’s forgivable. But now it is time to
admit the error, step up, and do the right thing. In this case, that means
taking a page from the Reagan playbook, meaning the Nancy Reagan playbook: Just
say, “No.”
Hell, no.
No comments:
Post a Comment