USA Today
Tuesday, May 31, 2016
Everyone, including Hillary Clinton, now agrees that the
newly confirmed secretary of State made a mistake in 2009 when she decided, for
the sake of “convenience,” to run her own email system out of her home in
Chappaqua, N.Y., rather than use an official State Department email account.
But a new report by State's inspector general makes clear
that within two years, Clinton's bad decision had turned into something far
worse: a threat to national security, one that she repeatedly ignored despite
multiple warnings.
Warning No. 1:
The report, released last week, reveals that in January 2011, hackers were
attacking her private server. Twice, the Hillary and Bill Clinton staffer
responsible for maintaining the server had to shut it off to protect data held
by America's top diplomat and the former president. The staffer notified State
Department officials of the attempted hack, and Clinton’s top aides there
emailed each other to say that “sensitive” matters should not be discussed with
Clinton over email.
Warning No. 2:
Two months later, the assistant secretary for diplomatic security sent a
memorandum on cybersecurity threats directly to Clinton, warning of a dramatic
increase in efforts "to compromise the private home email accounts of
senior department officials" in a likely attempt to "gain access to
policy documents and personal information that could enable technical
surveillance and possible blackmail.” The memo to Clinton warned her that some
personal email accounts had already been compromised and had “been reconfigured
… to automatically forward copies of all composed emails” to the hackers.
Warning No. 3:
That May, Clinton herself suspected that there might have been another hacking
incident when she "received an email with a suspicious link." Hours
after her aides discussed the issue over email, Clinton received another email
with a suspect link, this time from the personal account of the "under
secretary of State for political affairs."
Warning No. 4:
A month later, the State Department sent a cable to “all diplomatic and
consular posts” about the dangers of unsecured personal email accounts.
Staffers were ordered to “avoid conducting official Department business from
your personal e-mail accounts.” Who signed that cable? Hillary Clinton.
Those warnings, coming in a span of six months, should
have made any responsible public official, even one without Clinton’s access to
classified information on cyber threats from the vast U.S. intelligence
network, aware of the national security dangers of failing to secure the
secretary of State’s email communications.
Instead, Clinton and several of her top aides continued
to use personal email for sensitive State Department business thousands of
times.
If Clinton wants to become the president of the United
States, she needs to explain how she could make such a reckless decision. She
had a chance to answer questions when the Obama administration-appointed
inspector general contacted her about the investigation that was released last
week. Among five recent secretaries of State, only Clinton refused.
While Clinton is under potential criminal investigation
by the FBI for the mishandling of classified material sent through her email,
remaining silent might be in her best interests and it is certainly her right.
But to be president, she is going to have to convince voters that she can put
the national security of the United States above her own short-term
self-interest.
It's already clear that, in using the private email
server, Clinton broke the rules. Now it remains to be seen whether she also
broke the law.
No comments:
Post a Comment