By Rich Lowry
Tuesday, June 07, 2016
Yale English majors are demanding a safe space from
Chaucer.
In a petition to the English department, Yale
undergraduates declare that a required two-semester seminar on Major English
Poets is a danger to their well-being. Never mind that the offending poets –
Shakespeare, Chaucer, Donne, Milton, Wordsworth, et al. – are the foundational
writers in the English language. It’s as if chemistry students objected to
learning the periodic table or math students rose up against the teaching of
differential calculus.
The root of the plaint against the seminar is, of course,
the usual PC bean-counting, where prodigious talents who have stood the test of
time and explore the deepest questions about what it means to be human are
found wanting because they wouldn’t be suitable models for a United Colors of
Benetton ad.
The petition whines that “a year spent around a seminar
table where the literary contributions of women, people of color, and queer
folk are absent actively harms all students, regardless of their identity.”
This is a variation on the widespread belief on campus
that unwelcome speech is tantamount to a physical threat. In this case, the
speech happens to be some of the most eloquent words written in the English
language. One can only pity the exceedingly fragile sensibility it takes to
feel assaulted by, say, “Lines Composed a Few Miles above Tintern Abbey.”
The petition’s implicit contention is that the major
poets are too circumscribed by their race and gender to speak to today’s
socially aware students, when, in point of fact, it is the students who are too
blinkered by race and gender to marvel at great works of art.
It takes a deeply impoverished imagination to read
Shakespeare and regard him simply as an agent of the patriarchy. It is safe to
say that the bard is better at expressing what it is like to be a teenage girl
in love, or a woman disguised as a man who falls for a man, or a bloody tyrant
than almost every actual teenage girl in love, woman disguised as a man, or
bloody tyrant.
The poet Maya Angelou said in a lecture once that as a
child she thought, “Shakespeare must be a black girl.” It was because, growing
up in the Jim Crow South, a victim of unspeakable abuse, Sonnet 29 spoke so
powerfully to her. (“When in disgrace with fortune and men’s eyes, / I all
alone beweep my outcast state, / And trouble deaf heaven with my bootless
cries, / And look upon myself and curse my fate.”)
Yale’s petitioners must consider Toni Morrison a traitor
to her race and gender. She had an argument with a theater director years ago
in which she defended Othello, and
she went on to write a production based on Desdemona, the play’s doomed female
character. Or how about Derek Walcott, whom a Yale professor sympathetic to the
petitioners suggests adding to the required course? He told The Guardian newspaper a few years ago
that it would be absurd to say, “Don’t read Shakespeare because he was white.”
Anyone reading widely in the English canon will encounter
supremely talented female, black, and gay writers. In fact, many other Yale
courses feature them. But the creative stream began with so-called dead white
males. It is their genius that their words transcend their time and place and
have given us phrases, characters, and stories that are still vital today.
An official description of the Major English Poets
seminar says the classes seek to create a heightened “curiosity about the way
language works,” as well as “a confidence in engaging with historically and
formally diverse literary texts.” This is a reasonable enough academic goal —
unless the students involved are willfully incapable of curiosity or
confidence.
There is an easy solution to the dilemma of the aggrieved
petitioners: They shouldn’t study English, or anything else that might
challenge their absurdly small-minded ideological hobbyhorses.
No comments:
Post a Comment