By Ilya Shapiro
Thursday, June 30, 2016
This election has turned me into a libertarian. Yes,
given that I work at the Cato Institute, that statement seems either confusing
or trite, but hear me out.
It’s not that my political views have changed; I wasn’t a
secret socialist or paleo-conservative fifth-columnist in the heart of the
libertarian mother ship. While I don’t agree with all my colleagues on
everything, no two libertarians are in complete accord anyway (and are more
likely to be found arguing about whose libertarianism is purer). (For the
record, I fight the hypothetical and consider myself a classical liberal, so
anarcho-capitalists and liberaltarians may commence criticism.)
Nor is it that I’m now a capital-L Libertarian, offering
a full-throated endorsement of Gary Johnson. I mean, of the declared
candidates, of course I’d go for one who’s fit for office. But a lot could
happen between today and November 8. Clinton or Trump, or both, may not end up
on their respective parties’ ballot lines, or an independent could enter whom I
like more. Anyway, none of this means I’m throwing my lot in with the
Libertarian Party itself.
No, turning libertarian has little to do with either
ideology or partisanship. Instead, it’s an attitudinal shift.
I Care about What
Politics Does
I’d always been a pretty political guy: I’ve enjoyed
following the strategery, debating tactics, arguing historical
counter-factuals, and memorizing statistics. It’s like sports, except at the
end you’re left with more than just entertainment—which is scary when you
realize that the winners of this “game” get, instead of trophies, power to
control other people.
A lot of libertarians aren’t like that. Not that my
fellow travelers in the liberty movement are unique in that way; most Americans
aren’t political animals. For good reason: as George Mason University law
professor (and Cato adjunct scholar) Ilya Somin has detailed in his excellent
and often counterintuitive book “Democracy and Political Ignorance,” it makes
no rational sense learning political intricacies when your vote is
insignificant. Indeed, one measure of a country’s health and stability is how
little its citizens feel a need to engage with politics. People are busy with
jobs, kids, hobbies, and other much more important concerns.
Of course, self-identified libertarians are very much
into small-p politics—honing ideological consistency, identifying the best
policies, criticizing government—but many simply think getting “into the muck”
of capital-P Politics is a waste of time, especially when both major parties
have strong statist aspects. This is probably most true for the staunchest
non-interventionists.
There’s nothing necessarily wrong with that perspective,
but I’ve never been that way. I care a lot about political outcomes and have
figured that the best way I can advance them, especially given my skill set and
particular interest in legal policy and judicial nominations, is to work within
the system rather than ignore it.
Voting With a
Clean Conscience
Professionally I build unconventional coalitions,
engaging whichever politicians and interest groups can help on any given issue.
For example, I’ve joined dozens of organizations on Supreme Court amicus briefs
and regularly meet with a range of politicians. But politics is different from
the policy world in that you’re more often choosing the lesser of two evils,
working against a candidate’s opponent more than for the candidate himself.
That often involves supporting candidates who don’t score very high on
libertarian purity tests, like George W. Bush, John McCain, and Mitt Romney,
but whose party professes to care about and be influenced by classical-liberal
ideas and whose executive and judicial appointments I would prefer.
Granted, I only became a citizen two years ago, so this
will be the first presidential election where I can actually vote. (My first
non-presidential vote, in 2014, was to legalize marijuana in D.C.—not that
Johnson needs to make it his leading issue—after which I promptly moved to
Virginia.) But I consider voting to be my least important political activity,
which is a good thing given how unpalatable the suitors are for my first time.
No, this year, when both the Republicans and Democrats
are poised to nominate the most godawful presidential candidates imaginable,
count me out of conventional politics. I’ll instead be with the
too-cool-for-school black-leather-jacket crowd that decrees “a pox on both your
houses” before retiring to its absinthe snifters and e-cigars.
So far, I’ve found being an attitudinal libertarian to be
cathartic. It’s a better way of dealing with this political season’s
frustrations than arguing with your conscience about whether “Crooked Hillary”
or “Fraudulent Donald” would be least unacceptable.
No comments:
Post a Comment