By Charles C. W. Cooke
Wednesday, April 01, 2026
As a child, I was obsessed with the American space
program, which, along with the country’s unparalleled collection of
rollercoasters, was one of the many things that initially attracted me to the
United States and convinced me that it was better than everywhere else. I can
remember reading about the Apollo missions in awe, but also being shocked to
learn that, by the time of the later excursions — Apollo 15, Apollo 16, and
Apollo 17, in particular — the general public was no longer interested. This,
frankly, astonished and annoyed me. Naturally, nothing was going to beat Apollo
11 in the popular imagination, and, for obvious reasons, Apollo 13 had its own
grim televisual appeal. But these were manned missions to the moon!
How could the whole world not have been transfixed during every single one?
The best case I could come up with was that, in 1971 and
1972, Apoll0 11 had been recent. Amazing, yes. But amazing a couple of
years ago. Humans are impatient, complacent, and easily bored, and the moon
landing was so 1960s. Oh look, Dick Cavett’s on!
But what, pray, is the excuse for indifference now?
Today, from Cape Canaveral here in Florida, NASA is sending humans back to the
moon. This time, they’ll “only” orbit it. A few missions hence, they’ll land on
it. Such things are no longer recent. This will be the first time since the
Nixon administration that a person has left low earth orbit. That’s more than
half a century ago!
Does anyone care? I am fully aware that I cannot tell
people what they should be interested in. But I find it remarkable that this is
not the sole topic of discussion in America. The press is quiet on the matter.
Not a single one of my casual acquaintances has mentioned it. Heck, my son’s
baseball coach has scheduled a practice during the launch. It’s just not a big
thing — at least not relative to other apparently crucial subjects for
conversation, such as whether NBA players should be allowed to be Christians
and whether a pretty standard midterm-year correction in the stock markets
signals the end of the world. Are we crazy?
In the most recent issue of the magazine, I made a plea against misery:
It is, of course, virtuous for a
free people to attempt to improve the country they inherited. But it is a grave
mistake to believe that anything short of the establishment of heaven on earth
represents failure. What we have in the United States right now — it’s not a
matter of if or when or after or before, but right
now — is a miracle. This country — as it is. This economy — as it
is. This culture — as it is. This constitutional order — as it
is.
After all, though “Americans have become convinced that,
outside of their own enclaves, the United States is a hellscape,”
in the year of our Lord 2026, the
United States is no such thing. In fact, it is the best place in the world by
far. It has a durable constitutional order that, more than two centuries since
it was ratified, continues to protect individual rights to an extent that
remains unique in the West. It has the largest and most dynamic economy and the
highest standard of living of any large nation. It has the most impressive
higher-education sector; the best scientists, engineers, and doctors; and the
lion’s share of the global technology industry. It boasts massive natural
resources, including enough oil to remain energy-independent, vast tracts of
arable land, and abundant fresh water. It has the most fearsome military, the
world’s reserve currency, and the most important financial markets on earth.
And we’re going to the freaking moon!
No comments:
Post a Comment