By Nate Hochman
Tuesday, September 06, 2022
I’ve written relatively recently about how Dr. Oz is a,
uh, less-than-ideal candidate for Republicans to run in a battleground state
such as Pennsylvania. Last month, in response to this incredibly
weird, maybe-even-a-little-bit-creepy cartoon attack ad, I wrote:
Dr. Mehmet Oz, the Republican
Senate nominee in the battleground state of Pennsylvania, is flailing. He’s
down by about eleven points in the polls, despite the fact that his Democratic
opponent, John Fetterman — the goateed, heavyset, six-foot-eight-inch
lieutenant governor of the state whose down-home, working-class public
presentation is straight out of Pennsylvania central casting — was off the
campaign trail for the past three months after suffering a stroke. (Fetterman
held his first post-stroke public rally late last week.) Oz
needs a course correction, and quickly. Whatever he’s doing right now clearly
isn’t working.
Encouragingly, Fetterman’s lead over Oz appears to have
shrunk somewhat — the same FiveThirtyEight poll aggregate that I cited as
showing an eleven-point spread as of August 16 now shows Fetterman leading Oz
by just over eight points. As Jim Geraghty reported this morning, the two most recent one-off
polls have Fetterman’s lead down to four and five points, respectively. Some of
that may have to do with the strikingly obvious fact, made more apparent by his
return to public speaking events, that Fetterman
is far from recovered from the effects of his stroke.
As Jim noted, “There is also reason to think that
Fetterman’s refusal to debate is reawakening concerns about whether he’s really
healthy enough to serve as a senator. The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette editorial
board declared today that the Democrat’s decision to dodge a
debate legitimizes the critique that Fetterman is hiding how slowly he is
recovering.”
With all that being said, all of the problems that have
caused Dr. Oz to consistently trail Fetterman by wide margins over the course
of the race remain — and while it may have closed some, a Fetterman average of
+8 is still not great for our intrepid
magic-weight-loss-pill-salesman-turned-Republican-Senate-hopeful. Part of that
is at least partially because the kind of populist, workingman’s-Republican
profile that tends to resonate in states such as Pennsylvania — an image that
Oz, at various junctures,
has attempted to cultivate — is just . . . not Oz. The latest example of this
weakness is this video — leaked a couple of days ago from the left-wing
PatriotTakes group — of a past speech that Oz delivered to the National
Governors Association in which he expressed his belief that companies “shouldn’t
hire smokers.”
In a follow-up clip, Oz adds that “One day, and I think this
will be true for the state employees as well . . . they won’t be allowed to
smoke.”
I’m somewhat reluctant to give free media coverage to
left-wing messaging groups such as PatriotTakes, which devotes most of its
resources to digging up old clips of conservatives in an attempt to make them
look bad. But this is important, as it pertains to the broader issues with Oz.
Clips like the one depicting Oz arguing for nanny-state efforts to effectively
relegate cigarette smokers to the status of second-class citizens are just
going to feed into the Fetterman campaign’s attacks that Oz is an out-of-state
elitist — attacks that are made all the more effective by Oz’s vague efforts to
style himself as a populist outsider. The Republican’s recent surge in the
polls is salutary; for all his cringeworthiness, Oz would obviously take better
votes in the Senate than Fetterman, who’s staked out hard-left positions on a
number of issues — but if he wants a shot at making it over the finish line,
he’s going to need to find a more authentic message.
As the “don’t-hire-smokers” clips hammer home, Oz isn’t a
working-class man of the people — he’s as elite (and even more importantly,
elitist) as it gets. Voters aren’t stupid. He’d have a better shot
explaining how he can best deliver on their priorities in line with a more
honest accounting of who he is — see: Trump 2016’s “I’m so rich I can’t be bought,” my tax plan “is going to cost me a fortune,” etc. — than whatever he’s
doing now.
No comments:
Post a Comment