By Charles C. W. Cooke
Tuesday, September 06, 2022
President Biden says that he is engaged “in a battle
for the soul of this nation.” The trouble is, he doesn’t seem quite sure what
that means.
It is not unfair to ask: What is the
Biden administration? What is its purpose? What, besides a haphazard rehashing
of Absolutely Everything Progressives Have Ever Thought Of, is its program? Joe
Biden became president because the alternative was reelecting Donald Trump,
and, much to his detriment, Joe Biden has never managed to transcend that
elementary fact. Eighteen months in, his presidency still lacks a theme, a
focus, a narrative. The most pressing issues facing the country — inflation,
debt, energy — all seem to bore him. His foreign policy is non-existent. His
domestic priorities are determined by the transient concerns of Elizabeth
Warren’s emissaries to the White House and by the trending bar on Twitter. “Who
is really in charge?” Biden’s critics like to ask. The
question assumes too much. Nobody is in charge, because there’s nothing to be
in charge of. One might as well ask who is in charge of a feather floating in
the wind.
Around and around Biden spins — smiling here, glaring
there, emitting sparks without kindling, telling stories without meaning,
gesturing without function, striding purposelessly back and forth in search of
something, anything, that might reverse his slide toward irrelevance.
Rudderless, he motions momentarily toward tackling inflation, and then moves on
to something else. Desperate, he forswears responsibility: Gas prices are up?
That’s the oil companies’ fault. Hopeful, he snatches responsibility: Gas
prices are down? That’s Dark Brandon’s doing! Impotently, he yells and intones and
lectures, flitting between ersatz solemnity and peremptory ire with no
perceptible loss of vim. We have a crisis in this country, he says, in
whispers. What is that crisis? It’s Trump and his friends. Or, maybe, it’s
everyone in the Republican Party, or pro-lifers, or apologists for Wall Street,
or people with bad policy ideas. It’s something; he just hasn’t
quite decided what yet. He’ll get back to you on that.
When Biden said that he could sum up America in a single
word, and that that single word was “asufutimaehaehfutbw,” he was
inadvertently onto something. Often, Biden reaches for words that aren’t quite
there, and perhaps never were — “Regoduwidadefi,” “Trunalimunumaprzure” —
and, often, it doesn’t especially matter, because he wasn’t saying anything
comprehensible to begin with. And so it is with his conception of the United
States. Online, Biden acolytes pretend that the man is Demosthenes without the
pebbles. Biden will utter a keyword aloud — “Unity” or “Democracy” or “Honor” —
and his fans will cluck along. “Now that is leadership,” they
will enthuse. “It’s so nice to have a president who . . .”
Though it’s never how they finish the sentence, “a
president who isn’t Donald Trump” is always what they mean to say. But not
being Donald Trump is not a philosophy, a worldview, or an agenda; it’s a
staffing choice. And besides, the keywords that he throws around to signal that
his administration has some substantive purpose are invariably inaccurate. He’s
not a uniter. He’s not a moderate. He’s not honorable. He’s not competent. He’s
a weak, partisan hypocrite who has survived half a century in public service
because he’s willing to change with the political winds.
Every few months, Biden invites a cabal of historians to
the White House and asks them who he is, as if he were playing dress-up at
Halloween. Is he FDR? Is he LBJ? Is he Lincoln? This question should ring alarm
bells, but does it? Not enough, no. I have always comprehended why so many
Republicans decided in 2020 that they were going to vote for Joe Biden. I have
never understood why some of those people feel the need to keep insisting that
Joe Biden is a useful or admirable person.
Joe Biden is not a useful or admirable person today. And
he won’t be one tomorrow, or the next day, or any of the chaotic days after
that. Instead, Biden’s presidency is destined to serve as a study in contrasts:
between grandiose bluster and awkward inadequacy, lofty promises and vicious
reflexes, and what people wish were true and what actually is.
No comments:
Post a Comment