By Charles C. W. Cooke
Wednesday, June 01, 2022
Mother Jones confirms that President Biden’s apparent determination
to break the law and transfer hundreds of billions of dollars of student loan
debt to taxpayers is the result of relentless agitation by some of the most
selfish and outlandish people in these United States. In a piece lauding “Debt
Collective,” America’s first “debtors’ union,” the magazine notes that, “over
the last decade,” the group
has laid crucial organizing and
legal groundwork that has helped shift the terms of debate around the idea of
canceling student loans. They’ve helped to transform the concept from a fringe
pipe dream into a near political inevitability.
This is wrong, of course. President Biden may, indeed, be
considering doing what Debt Collective has asked. But that does not mean that
what they have asked is not “fringe,” and it most certainly does
not change the fact that it is flatly illegal.
Seriously, just listen to these people:
“The idea that these debts aren’t
carved in stone, which is what they feel like—changing that as a norm has to
start somewhere, and they started it,” says Eileen Connor, a Debt Collective
collaborator who directs litigation at Harvard Law School’s Project on
Predatory Student Lending.
What absolute nonsense. This really isn’t
that difficult to grasp: If you take out loans to pay for a service you want,
you must pay those loans back in full per the schedule you agree to when you
took out those loans. Americans with student-loan debt have borrowed that money
from taxpayers. If they don’t pay it back, those taxpayers will have to eat the
cost. Not only is that unjust, it’s entirely self-serving. Amazingly enough,
taxpayers don’t seem to be covered by the “not carved in stone” standard that
Debt Collective has invented out of whole cloth. That builder who didn’t go to
college, but who is now saddled with someone else’s debt? He still
has to pay his taxes. As far as the IRS is concerned, those taxes are “carved
in stone.”
Of course, to the college students who wish to freeload
off everyone else, such people simply don’t matter:
The two-year payment freeze has
created relief for debtors and, collective members say, proved that the federal
government can get along fine without student loan revenue.
What? What? Where do these people think money
comes from? Every dollar that isn’t paid back has to come from somewhere else —
either in the form of taxes on everyone else, or in the form of yet more
federal debt. It gets boring pointing this out, but the case for student-loan
transference is no more noble than that some people would like other people to
give them lots of money. That’s it. That’s the whole policy. They borrowed
money to pay for a service. They got — and benefited from — that service. And
now they’d like someone else to write them a big check so that they don’t have
to keep their side of the bargain. It’s utterly revolting.
If this were actually to happen, the Republican Party
must scorch the earth in response. Massive structural reform would be
inevitable — if we can no longer expect student debt to be paid back, we must
stop issuing it — as would the recouping of whatever money President Biden
illegally spends. You know what else could be “uncarved” in pursuit of that
end? Harvard’s $53.2 billion endowment, that’s what. If this is the game we’re
playing now, the next Republican Congress should “start somewhere” and take it
all. You know, to “change norms” — or whatever.
No comments:
Post a Comment